Abstract 4110
Background
Impaired DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms and subsequent genomic instability is associated with carcinogenic process itself, but it also results in sensitivity of tumor cells to certain drugs and can be exploited to treat cancer by inducing deadly mutations or mitotic catastrophe. As a result, BRCA1/2 testing is recommended for a group individuals with breast/ovarian cancer.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively invesitigated clinicopathologic features of 303 breast cancer patients tested for BRCA 1/2 mutation in an oncology institute. NCCN recommendations are used to select patients to be tested for BRCA mutations.
Results
A total of 303 patients were analysed for BRCA 1/2 mutations. Median age of the patients at diagnoses were 40 (21-65). Family history for BRCA related cancers were detected in 120 patients (39.6%). BRCA 1/2 mutations have been shown in 98 of 303 patients (32.3%). Of 98 BRCA mutated patients, 43 had pathogenic BRCA1 mutation, 39 had pathogenic BRCA2 mutation, 11 had variant of uncertain significance (VUS) BRCA2 mutation, 3 had VUS BRCA1 mutation and 2 had pathogenic BRCA1 and 2 mutations. Molecular subtypes of tumors have been shown in Table.Table:
316P Molecular subtypes of tumors
BRCA Status | HR(+)/ HER2(-), N(%) | HR(+)/ HER2(+), N(%) | HR(-)/ HER2(+), N (%) | Triple(-), N (%) | N/A,N(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | 18 (41.8%) | 2 (4.6%) | 0 | 22 (51.1%) | 1 (2.3%) |
BRCA2 | 25 (64.1%) | 3 (7.7%) | 0 | 6 (15.3%) | 5 (12.8%) |
BRCA1 VUS | 2 (66.7%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (33.3%) | 0 |
BRCA2 VUS | 11 (100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BRCA1 + 2 | 0 | 1 (50%) | 0 | 1 (50%) | 0 |
BRCA mut (-) | 126 (61.4%) | 25 (12.1%) | 12 (5.8%) | 32 (15.6%) | 10 (4.8%) |
TOTAL | 182 (60%) | 31 (10.2%) | 12 (3.9%) | 62 (20.4%) | 16 (5.2%) |
Twelve of 98 BRCA mutated patients (12.2%) were de novo metastatic while 15 patients (15.3%) faced with metastatic disease during follow-up. In the BRCA mutated group there was significantly high rate of metastatic disease has been detected comparing BRCA non-mutated group (27.5% vs %16.5% respectively, p = 0.026). Metastatic BRCA mutant patients showed worse OS numerically but data is not statistically significant (P = 0.894). Nine patients were diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer, and 3 patients was diagnosed with BRCA-related cancers during follow-up. Prophylactic surgery (contralateral mastectomy and/or oophorectomy) was performed in 32 of 98 patients.
Conclusions
According to this retrospective study, BRCA mutant patients tend to have worse clinical and pathological features comparing age-matched controls.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sercan Aksoy.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4317 - Prognostic factors analysis of 343 patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Yixun Lu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4099 - Effects of preoperative preparation time on efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Xinxin Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3769 - The prognostic value of higher absolute lymphocyte counts for patients with surgically resected non-advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1718 - Trastuzumab and pertuzumab added to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable HER2+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients: an update on survival and predictive biomarkers in the TRAP study
Presenter: Charlotte Stroes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5403 - Interim analysis of a phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy plus avelumab in esophagogastric and gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Thierry Alcindor
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
591 - Evaluation of the introduction of primary G-CSF prophylaxis to the FLOT chemotherapy regimen.
Presenter: Kelly-Marie Crampton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1402 - Subgroup analyses of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 2 and 4 courses of cisplatin/S-1 (CS) and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Tsutomu Hayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3743 - HER2 Copy Number as Predictor of Disease-Free Survival in HER2-Positive Resectable Gastric Cancer
Presenter: Zimin Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2032 - Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the Programmed Death-1 pathway in esophageal and gastric cancer
Presenter: Maria Svensson
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4304 - A user-friendly nomogram to predict relapse-free survival (RFS) in western patients with resected gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Massimiliano Salati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract