Abstract 1742
Background
Brain metastases (BM) is a commonly encountered clinical scenario in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer (BC). We report here the clinical profile and outcome of patients with HER2 positive breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) who were treated with HER2 targeted therapy at a single institution.
Methods
Clinical and outcome data of patients with HER2 positive BCBM treated with HER2 targeted agents were retrospectively collected. Efficacy variables were progression-free survival (PFS, time from diagnosis of BM to first progression or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Between 2013 and 2017, 102 HER2 positive BCBM patients with median age 52 (IQR 45-57) years were treated with HER2 targeted therapy. Of these, 40 (39.2%) had ER positive disease, 98 (96.1%) were symptomatic at diagnosis of BM, 69 (67.6%) had received ≥2 lines of chemotherapy before BM, 22 (25.3%) had solitary brain lesion, 22 (25.3%) had 2-5 lesions and 43 (49.4%) had > 5 lesions. After BM diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was administered in 93 (91.2%) patients, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in 4 (4.0%), WBRT and SRS in 4 (4%), and 9 (8.9%) patients underwent surgical resection of BM. The first HER2 targeted therapy after BM diagnosis was lapatinib in 70 (68.6%), trastuzumab in 19 (18.6%), lapatinib and trastuzumab in 3 (2.9%), trastuzumab emtansine in 4 (3.9%) and intrathecal trastuzumab in 5 (4.9%), patients. After diagnosis of BM, 17 (16.7%) patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, there were 91 PFS events and 80 deaths. The median PFS after BM was 8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.2-9.8] months and median OS was 14 (95%CI, 10.8-17.2) months with a 2-year OS of 25% (95% CI, 16.7-34.4%). Median PFS in patients who received lapatinib-capecitabine regimen (n = 62) was 9.0 (95%CI, 7.3-10.7) months.
Conclusions
The median OS in patients with HER2 positive BCBM, treated with HER2 targeted therapy, is good and exceeds that reported in metastatic triple negative breast cancer. The difference between median PFS and OS suggests that continued treatment after first or subsequent progression may be therapeutically beneficial in some patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sudeep Gupta.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Bajpai: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Samsung Bioepis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sun Pharma. S. Gupta: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Johnson & Johnson; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celltrion; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncosten; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Intas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocon; Advisory / Consultancy: Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Core Diagnostics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4331 - STING Agonist, ADU-S100, Yields Potent Antitumor Activity and Therapeutically Favorable Immune Profile in an Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Model
Presenter: Ali Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1770 - Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3755 - A new docetaxel (DOC)-based triplet regimen does not improve the outcome of metastatic (M) or locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer (GC) as compared with an epirubicin (EPI) standard triplet regimen: a GISCAD trial.
Presenter: Roberto Labianca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2439 - The analysis of T cell subsets and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades in patients with advanced gastric cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Tae-yong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2211 - First-line pembrolizumab (P), trastuzumab (T), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-positive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Presenter: Yelena Janjigian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3046 - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumor response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4628 - Gastric cancer screening in BRCA 2 gene mutation carriers: should it be recommended?
Presenter: Inês Oliveira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2127 - Interim analysis of an observational/translational study for nivolumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-08 (DELIVER trial)
Presenter: Yu Sunakawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2264 - Prediction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in Stage II/III gastric cancer treatment based on comprehensive gene expression analysis
Presenter: Masanori Terashima
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2444 - Assessing the clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA through longitudinal liquid biopsy sampling in Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Emma Ococks
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract