Abstract 1742
Background
Brain metastases (BM) is a commonly encountered clinical scenario in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer (BC). We report here the clinical profile and outcome of patients with HER2 positive breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) who were treated with HER2 targeted therapy at a single institution.
Methods
Clinical and outcome data of patients with HER2 positive BCBM treated with HER2 targeted agents were retrospectively collected. Efficacy variables were progression-free survival (PFS, time from diagnosis of BM to first progression or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Between 2013 and 2017, 102 HER2 positive BCBM patients with median age 52 (IQR 45-57) years were treated with HER2 targeted therapy. Of these, 40 (39.2%) had ER positive disease, 98 (96.1%) were symptomatic at diagnosis of BM, 69 (67.6%) had received ≥2 lines of chemotherapy before BM, 22 (25.3%) had solitary brain lesion, 22 (25.3%) had 2-5 lesions and 43 (49.4%) had > 5 lesions. After BM diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was administered in 93 (91.2%) patients, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in 4 (4.0%), WBRT and SRS in 4 (4%), and 9 (8.9%) patients underwent surgical resection of BM. The first HER2 targeted therapy after BM diagnosis was lapatinib in 70 (68.6%), trastuzumab in 19 (18.6%), lapatinib and trastuzumab in 3 (2.9%), trastuzumab emtansine in 4 (3.9%) and intrathecal trastuzumab in 5 (4.9%), patients. After diagnosis of BM, 17 (16.7%) patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, there were 91 PFS events and 80 deaths. The median PFS after BM was 8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.2-9.8] months and median OS was 14 (95%CI, 10.8-17.2) months with a 2-year OS of 25% (95% CI, 16.7-34.4%). Median PFS in patients who received lapatinib-capecitabine regimen (n = 62) was 9.0 (95%CI, 7.3-10.7) months.
Conclusions
The median OS in patients with HER2 positive BCBM, treated with HER2 targeted therapy, is good and exceeds that reported in metastatic triple negative breast cancer. The difference between median PFS and OS suggests that continued treatment after first or subsequent progression may be therapeutically beneficial in some patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sudeep Gupta.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Bajpai: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Samsung Bioepis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sun Pharma. S. Gupta: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Johnson & Johnson; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celltrion; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Oncosten; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Intas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocon; Advisory / Consultancy: Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Core Diagnostics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3191 - The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria of the phase 3 trial (REFLECT trial) and those with BCLC Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma - A nationwide multicenter study in Japan-
Presenter: Azusa Sakamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1529 - Prognostic and predictive value of baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with ramucirumab from two phase 3 studies (REACH, REACH-2)
Presenter: Andrew Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2767 - Effect of second-line cabozantinib on health states for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) after sorafenib: QTWiST analysis from the CELESTIAL study
Presenter: Nicholas Freemantle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2150 - Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase 3 RESORCE trial
Presenter: Jordi Bruix
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3437 - Phase I/II trial of NBTXR3 activated by SBRT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis
Presenter: Marc Pracht
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1758 - Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first-line sorafenib across age subgroups in two global phase 3 trials (REACH and REACH-2)
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1192 - Ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP): An exposure–response analysis
Presenter: Josep Llovet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1600 - Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated with Nivolumab: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience.
Presenter: Sirish Dharmapuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2364 - Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma (AC) or Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus as Second-Line Therapy: Analysis of the Chinese Subgroup in KEYNOTE-181
Presenter: Jia Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1933 - A national comparative effectiveness study to assess definitive chemoradiation regimens in proximal oesophageal squamous cell cancer
Presenter: Judith de Vos-Geelen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract