Abstract 2527
Background
Clinically meaningful measures of response are needed in mCRPC. Post-treatment CTC decline have shown to be superior to PSA response in determining outcome in pts treated with AR signalling inhibitors. We compared the performance of CTC and PSA measures of response in mCRPC Doc-treated pts.
Methods
Baseline and post-treatment (6 to 9 weeks) CTC of mCRPC pts treated with Doc at first or second-line in a prospective study were determined with CellSearchTM platform. CTC response was defined: 30% decline from baseline (CTC30%), conversion (≥5 to < 5; CTCConv) or decline to 0 CTC in pts with >0 baseline CTC (CTC0). PSA response was determined at 12w as 30% (PSA30) or 50% decline (PSA50) from baseline. Cox-regression model were used to evaluate the association of baseline CTC (BLCTC), CTC response and PSA response measures with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time to PSA progression (TTPP). C-index were used to evaluate the performance of each of the Cox regression model.
Results
80 pts had evaluable BLCTC, 52 had evaluable post-treatment CTC count. Of 80 eligible pts, 53 (66.3%) received Doc at first-line. Median OS was 19 m (95%CI:16.4-21.8); median BLCTC was 7. BLCTC were associated with bone mts, higher PSA, ALP and LDH, and lower albumin levels. BLCTC was associated with OS (HR: 3.5; p < 0.001), PFS (HR: 1.98; p = 0.001) and TTPP (HR: 1.8; p = 0.001). CTC (CTC30%, CTCConv, CTC0) but not PSA (PSA30, PSA50) response measures were significantly associated with OS. C-index values were higher for CTC resp endpoints (Table). 24 pts had discordant PSA30 and CTC30% response; longer OS (18.4 vs 8.4m; p = 0.188) was observed in pts with CTC30% resp, without PSA30 resp.Table:
889P
N (%) | HR (95%CI); p-value | C-index | |
---|---|---|---|
CTC Conv | 27 (51.9) | 0.33 (0.18-0.60); p < 0.001 | 0.665 |
CTC0 | 8 (15.4) | 0.26 (0.10-0.67); p = 0.005 | 0.602 |
CTC30% | 34 (65.4) | 0.33 (0.18-0.61); p < 0.001 | 0.644 |
PSA30 | 32 (61.5) | 0.72 (0.40-1.30); p = 0.271 | 0.563 |
PSA50 | 22 (42.3) | 0.68 (0.38-1.20); p = 0.183 | 0.595 |
Conclusions
Baseline CTC were associated with OS, PFS and TTPP. CTC response measures were significantly associated with outcome, and showed a greater performance than PSA response measures in mCRPC Doc-treated pts.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO) and The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Lozano Mejorada: Honoraria (self): Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Janssen-Cilag; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas Pharma. D. Lorente: Honoraria (self): Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Sanofi; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene. E. Castro: Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Astellas Pharma. N. Romero Laorden: Honoraria (self): MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, PharmaMar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis. E. Almagro Casado: Honoraria (self): MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. M. Saez: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma. D. Olmos Hidalgo: Honoraria (self): Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Medications/Pfizer, Astellas, Tokai, MSD, GSK; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2344 - Lung Cancer in Europe: strengthening policy responses to address unmet needs
Presenter: Mary Bussell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1359 - Curative treatment timelines for breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer: Implications for medical leave coverage
Presenter: Selina Wong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4433 - Acute Diagnostic Oncology Clinic: A Unique Primary Care-Oncology Service
Presenter: Abhijit Gill
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3506 - THE NEW MUTATIONAL MODEL IN ONCOLOGY. What changes in welfare, clinical practice, research, and regulatory procedures
Presenter: Nicola Normanno
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3350 - Selection of a set of quality indicators (QI) for oncological clinical pathway
Presenter: Aude Fourcade
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4400 - Sustainable drug prices at market launch: policy proposals and their empirical evidence
Presenter: Nora Fanzen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4118 - Impact of financial considerations on French physicians’ prescription choices for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Nathalie Olympios
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1340 - The direct medical cost of breast cancer in a Belgian hospital
Presenter: Hannan Lemhouer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1863 - Does the healthcare system approaches cancer patients for using private services during diagnostic process?
Presenter: Karolina Osowiecka
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2637 - Measuring financial toxicity of cancer in the Italian health care system: initial results of the patient reported outcome for Fighting Financial Toxicity of cancer project (proFFiT).
Presenter: Silvia Riva
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract