Abstract 2527
Background
Clinically meaningful measures of response are needed in mCRPC. Post-treatment CTC decline have shown to be superior to PSA response in determining outcome in pts treated with AR signalling inhibitors. We compared the performance of CTC and PSA measures of response in mCRPC Doc-treated pts.
Methods
Baseline and post-treatment (6 to 9 weeks) CTC of mCRPC pts treated with Doc at first or second-line in a prospective study were determined with CellSearchTM platform. CTC response was defined: 30% decline from baseline (CTC30%), conversion (≥5 to < 5; CTCConv) or decline to 0 CTC in pts with >0 baseline CTC (CTC0). PSA response was determined at 12w as 30% (PSA30) or 50% decline (PSA50) from baseline. Cox-regression model were used to evaluate the association of baseline CTC (BLCTC), CTC response and PSA response measures with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time to PSA progression (TTPP). C-index were used to evaluate the performance of each of the Cox regression model.
Results
80 pts had evaluable BLCTC, 52 had evaluable post-treatment CTC count. Of 80 eligible pts, 53 (66.3%) received Doc at first-line. Median OS was 19 m (95%CI:16.4-21.8); median BLCTC was 7. BLCTC were associated with bone mts, higher PSA, ALP and LDH, and lower albumin levels. BLCTC was associated with OS (HR: 3.5; p < 0.001), PFS (HR: 1.98; p = 0.001) and TTPP (HR: 1.8; p = 0.001). CTC (CTC30%, CTCConv, CTC0) but not PSA (PSA30, PSA50) response measures were significantly associated with OS. C-index values were higher for CTC resp endpoints (Table). 24 pts had discordant PSA30 and CTC30% response; longer OS (18.4 vs 8.4m; p = 0.188) was observed in pts with CTC30% resp, without PSA30 resp.Table:
889P
N (%) | HR (95%CI); p-value | C-index | |
---|---|---|---|
CTC Conv | 27 (51.9) | 0.33 (0.18-0.60); p < 0.001 | 0.665 |
CTC0 | 8 (15.4) | 0.26 (0.10-0.67); p = 0.005 | 0.602 |
CTC30% | 34 (65.4) | 0.33 (0.18-0.61); p < 0.001 | 0.644 |
PSA30 | 32 (61.5) | 0.72 (0.40-1.30); p = 0.271 | 0.563 |
PSA50 | 22 (42.3) | 0.68 (0.38-1.20); p = 0.183 | 0.595 |
Conclusions
Baseline CTC were associated with OS, PFS and TTPP. CTC response measures were significantly associated with outcome, and showed a greater performance than PSA response measures in mCRPC Doc-treated pts.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO) and The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Lozano Mejorada: Honoraria (self): Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Janssen-Cilag; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas Pharma. D. Lorente: Honoraria (self): Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Sanofi; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene. E. Castro: Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Astellas Pharma. N. Romero Laorden: Honoraria (self): MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, PharmaMar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis. E. Almagro Casado: Honoraria (self): MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. M. Saez: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, EUSA Pharma. D. Olmos Hidalgo: Honoraria (self): Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Medications/Pfizer, Astellas, Tokai, MSD, GSK; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract