Abstract 3093
Background
Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer (BC) progression and discordance between primary and metastases ranges between 16% and 21% for Hormone Receptor (HR) expression in some series. The impact of this change on patient (pts) management and outcome is not yet clear, even though preliminary data indicate that the molecular characterization of recurrent breast cancer may induce clinicians to modify the treatment choice in ∼14% of the cases and that a change in the receptor status is associated with poorer survival. This analysis evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences.
Methods
We used data of 879 pts of the longitudinal cohort AMBRA study, identifying 3 different groups: Group A: HR+ BC remaining HR+ at relapse; Group BHR+ BC becoming TNBC; Group C:TNBC remaining TNBC. Change in HR status was evaluated on the biopsy done at the moment of relapse. Time to event was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test; Mean/median by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test.
Results
Pts who underwent biopsy at the time of relapse were 545/879 (62%), of those 462 (84.4%) were classified as Luminal tumors and 83 (15.2%) TNBC on primary. Change in tumor phenotype occurred in 31 (6.7%) of Luminal BC and 16 (19.3%) TNBC, probably due to a higher genomic instability (p = 0.021). Median DFS between Luminal BC was not different: HR+àHR+: 74.56 months (95%CI 66.8-82.1) vs HR+àTNBC: 89.73 months (95%CI:44.73-103.46). Table summarizes main data in time to event in the 3 identified groups. *PFS at 1strelapse; **PFS at 2nd relapse; ***Time to Treatment Change at 1strelapse; °OS at 1strelapse; §OS from 1stPDTable:
325P
HR+/HR + (range) Group A | HR+/TNBC (range) Group B | p value Group A vs C | TNBC/TNBC (range) Group C | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PFS1* (months) | 13.65 (0,77-162,03) | 9.45 (3,97-52,73) | 0.36 | 8.13 (6.3-10.9) |
PFS2** (months) | 6.83 (0,00-57,13) | 6.12 (2,67-26,30) | 0.84 | 4.20 (0,33-22,17) |
TTC1*** (months) | 12.43 (0,13-163,10) | 8.88 (0,00-48,40) | 0.50 | 7.88 (0,23-27,80) |
TTC2**** (months) | 7.45 (0,00-55,97) | 6.73 (3,77-26,80) | na | na |
OS1° (months) | 23.1 (20-26) | 15 (8.7-26.3) | 0.031 | 3.60 (0,60-25,38) |
OS (years) | 8.52 (0,26-115,92) | 7.86 (0,19-30,67) | 0.43 | 3.58 (2.91-2.39) |
OS from PD1§ (months) | 25.8 (0,00-207,53) | 17.23 (2,67-104,30) | 0.82 | 17.90 (2,37-53,57) |
Conclusions
Change in tumor phenotype has a significant impact on OS; BC pts who become TNBC at relapse should be treated in the same way as TNBC pts at diagnosis. Anyway, OS of Luminal BC who change phenotype seems to be better than TNBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
GIM - Gruppo Italiano Mammella.
Funding
Celgene.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4616 - Alpelisib (ALP) + Endocrine Therapy (ET) by Last Prior Therapy in Patients (pts) With PIK3CA-Mutated Hormone-Receptor Positive (HR+) Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative (HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Additional Study Cohort in BYLieve
Presenter: Eva Ciruelos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3592 - PRECYCLE: Impact of CANKADO-based eHealth-support on quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy.
Presenter: Tom Degenhardt
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4168 - Efficacy and safety of oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor fluzoparib in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer
Presenter: Ning Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2785 - Effect of response to last platinum-based chemotherapy in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma in the phase 3 study ARIEL3 of rucaparib maintenance treatment
Presenter: Jonathan Ledermann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3496 - Integrated safety analysis of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer in the treatment and maintenance settings
Presenter: Rebecca Kristeleit
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2844 - Clinical factors associated with prolonged response and survival under olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCA mutated ovarian cancers
Presenter: S.Intidhar Labidi-Galy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1955 - A Prospective Evaluation of Tolerability of Niraparib Dosing Based on Baseline Body Weight (BW) and Platelet (plt) Count: Blinded Pooled Interim Safety Data from the NORA Study
Presenter: Xiaohua Wu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2539 - Evaluation of Niraparib 200 mg/d as Maintenance Therapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Associated Thrombocytopenia in a Real-World US Setting
Presenter: Premal Thaker
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1290 - Niraparib initial dose and its’ management in patients with recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Jacek Grabowski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3353 - Results of the 3rd interim analysis of C-Patrol: A non-interventional study on olaparib in German routine clinical practice
Presenter: Jalid Sehouli
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract