Abstract 1087
Background
Several lines of evidence suggest that the gut microbiome represents a novel biomarker in the era of immuno-oncology. Therefore, the prospective collection of fecal samples is now routinely included in clinical trials and acts as a new challenge for research nurses. However, little is known about patient compliance in the collection process. The objective of this study was to assess enrolment and compliance rates for fecal sample collection.
Methods
Fecal samples were prospectively collected in two academic institutions, University of Montreal Hospital and Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, using the International Human Microbiome Standards SOP Version 3 in the following groups: (1) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) amenable to immune checkpoint inhibitors and (2) patients with early-stage NSCLC or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a pre-operative stage. Informed and written consent were obtained by research nurses and patient baseline characteristics were collected. Upon consent, a white opaque polypropylene pot with an anaerobic generator bag was provided to the patient, along with a document to explain the self-collection technique. Enrolment (signing of consent) and compliance (returning the sample) rates were analysed using a Chi-squared method.
Results
A total of 267 patients were eligible for the study and 252 (94%) patients with a median age of 64 agreed to sign the consent form. The enrolment rate in the study reached 96% (175/183) in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to 92% (77/84) in patients with early stage cancers undergoing surgical resection who did not receive immunotherapy (p = 0.01). Overall patient compliance was 81% (204/252). Importantly, compliance was significantly higher in the pre-immunotherapy setting (94%, 164/175) versus the pre-operative group (52%, 40/77) (p = 0.01). Furthermore, regardless of the cancer stage, women (82% or 77 patients) were more compliant than men (80% or 127 patients) (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
New tools to increase compliance and assist patients in sample collection should be developed, especially for male patients diagnosed with early stage disease who are undergoing surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bertrand Routy.
Funding
Montreal Cancer Institute.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract