Abstract 2362
Background
Tumour molecular profiling in HNSCC is not routinely incorporated into clinical practice due to lack of validated biomarkers. Liquid biopsy represents noninvasive approach to capture tumour heterogeneity and evolution during treatment. We utilized highly sensitive sequencing method, SafeSEQ, to evaluate plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in 2 cohorts of HNSCC patients (pts) with locally advanced (LA) and metastatic disease.
Methods
Cohort 1 included 54 pts with LA HNSCC treated with cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. Plasma was obtained at baseline, end of treatment (EOT) and disease progression (PD) and compared to baseline tissue mutation status. Cohort 2 included 15 pts with metastatic disease who received nivolumab, plasma results were compared at baseline and post 2ndcycle. Sequencing for p53, CDKN2A, HRAS and PIK3CA was performed with SafeSEQ on both plasma and tissue specimens.
Results
51/54 pts with LA disease were evaluated at baseline for tissue (t) and plasma (p) mutation status. P53 was the most common mutation (t: 49%), p: 39%) followed by CDKN2A (t: 17.6%,p: 4%), PIK3CA (t: 9.8%, p: 6%) and HRAS (t: 7.8%, p: 4%). Interestingly 3 (5.8%) pts had detectable HRAS mutations in plasma that were not detected in tissue at baseline. In LA pts whose tumor harbored mutation, ctDNA was detectable in 56% at baseline. Concordance of mutation results between baseline plasma and tissue was 51%. At PD (N = 10) ctDNA exhibited higher rate of detectability compared to baseline and novel mutations emerged in 40% of cases. In cohort 2, 93% (14/15) of metastatic pts exhibited a detectable plasma mutation prior to and during treatment with nivolumab (p53 (100%), CDKN2A (28.6%), HRAS (21%) and PI3KCA (7%)). The pt with no mutation detected was HPV+. During treatment, new plasma HRAS mutations emerged in 3 (21%) pts, while nivolumab did not modulate the overall mutation profile. There was trend for better PFS in pts of cohort 1 whose tumors contained none of analyzed mutations (p = 0.08) while disruptive p53 mutation status based on Poeta classification was not prognostic.
Conclusions
Plasma mutation detection with SafeSEQ is useful in HNSCC for molecular profiling and real-time disease monitoring and may inform clinical trial design.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University funding & Company.
Funding
Sysmex-inostics.
Disclosure
D. Edelstein: Full / Part-time employment: Sysmex-Inostics. K. Stieler: Full / Part-time employment: Sysmex-Inostics. D. Heim: Full / Part-time employment: Sysmex-inostics. F. Holtrup: Full / Part-time employment: Sysmex-inostics. A. Psyrri: Research grant / Funding (institution): Kura; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Leo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract