Abstract 1117
Background
To determine biomarkers predictive of overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients treated with a peptide-based cancer vaccine.
Methods
The samples from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) for advanced prostate cancer patients (n = 306) and recurrent glioblastoma (n = 88) patients, those from one single arm phase II trial of PPV for various types of advanced cancer patients (n = 2588), and those from one randomized placebo-controlled non-personalized phase II trial (n = 51) were provided for this retrospective biomarker study.
Results
No significant differences in clinical benefit (overall survival, OS) were found between the patients receiving PPV and those receiving placebo in each of the two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials. The neutrophil or lymphocyte proportion in advanced prostate cancer patients prior to study entry was a biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (70%) who showed significantly shorter OS relative to placebo patients from the remaining PPV patients who showed significantly longer OS relative to placebo patients. The CCL2 level prior to the study entry in recurrent glioblastoma patients was the other biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (40%) who showed significantly shorter OS relative to placebo patients from the remaining PPV patients who showed significantly longer OS relative to placebo patients. The neutrophil or lymphocyte proportion prior to study entry was also a biomarker discriminating the PPV patients (60%) with significantly shorter OS from the remaining PPV patients entered in the single arm phase II study in all the advanced cancer patients other than gastric cancer or glioblastoma patients. This marker could also discriminate patients who showed significantly shorter OS from the remaining patients in the non-personalized peptide vaccine phase II study for prostate cancer patients.
Conclusions
Peptide-based cancer vaccine shortened the OS of a large portion, but not all, of advanced cancer patients with various types of cancer. Prospective clinical studies of peptide-based cancer vaccines using the newly defined prognostic markers may be warranted.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, 6970, 113088, 11028, 1482, 1839, 1844, 1847, 1850, 1854, 1855, 1856, 1875, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 2282, 3590, 5631, 6249, 6295, 6493, 7493, 8126, 8823, 8824, 8825, 8826, 8827, 8828, 10068, 19390, 2906, 2907, 2908, 2984, 2985, 2987, 3027, 3028, 3029, 3059, 3060, 3081, 3082, 3083, 5329, 10290, 11593, 14855, 19802, 19879, 6927,11230.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
President Kyogo Itoh,M.D., Ph.D., Cancer vaccine center, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.
Funding
Grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (16ck0106086h0003, 18im0110802h0008), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, and FUJIFILM Corporation.
Disclosure
M. Noguchi: Advisory / Consultancy: BrightPath Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd. A. Yamada: Advisory / Consultancy: BrightPath Biotherapeutics Co. Ltd. K. Itoh: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Company. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract