Abstract 5458
Background
Lanreotide autogel (LAN) is a long-acting somatostatin analogue used to treat somatostatin receptor-positive (SSTR+), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs).1 In the CLARINET study, LAN 120 mg every (q)28 days significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with metastatic, SSTR+ GEPNETs. CLARINET FORTE is an ongoing phase II study assessing the safety and efficacy (centrally assessed median PFS) of increasing the frequency of LAN 120 mg dosing (q14 days) in patients with progressive pancreatic NETs (panNETs) or midgut NETs.
Methods
Eligible patients had well-differentiated, metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable, G1/G2, panNETs or midgut NETs with a proliferation index (Ki-67) ≤20%. Patients had radiological progressive disease within 2 years prior to study inclusion as assessed by central review, while receiving first-line treatment with LAN 120 mg with standard treatment intervals (q28) days for ≥24 weeks. Following a 28-day screening interval, LAN 120 mg was administered q14 days. In total, 99 enrolled patients from 10 countries received treatment.
Results
Table: 1388P
Baseline characteristics | ||
---|---|---|
panNET (n = 48) | Midgut NET (n = 51) | |
Age, mean (SD) | 63.3 (10.6) | 67.1 (8.2) |
Male, n (%) | 20 (41.7) | 29 (56.9) |
Tumour grading*, % | - | - |
1 | 22.9 | 54.9 |
2 | 77.1 | 45.1 |
Proliferation index Ki-67, mean (SD) | 6.2 (4.6) | 3.5 (3.8) |
Proliferation index Ki-67 category, n (%) | - | - |
≥10% | 9 (18.8) | 4 (8.0) |
<10% | 39 (81.3) | 46 (92.0) |
≤2%† | 11 (28.2) | 28 (60.9) |
2–10%† | 28 (71.8) | 18 (39.1) |
Missing | 0 | 1 |
Hepatic tumour load, n (%) >25% ≤25% Missing | - 6 (13.3) 39 (86.7) 3 | - 9 (17.6) 42 (82.4) 0 |
Previous primary tumour surgery | 18 (37.5) | 12 (23.5) |
Krenning scale, n (%) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 N/A‡ Missing | - 0 6 (12.5) 10 (20.8) 28 (58.3) 4 (8.3) 0 | - 4 (8.5) 4 (8.5) 15 (31.9) 21 (44.7) 3 (6.4) 4 |
Duration of LAN treatment (standard dosing interval) prior to study enrolment in months, median (range) | 21.7 (5–103) | 16.4 (5–198) |
Diarrhoea presence, % Flushing presence, % | 16.7 8.3 | 41.7 28.0 |
WHO classification
†Percentages are based on the number of subjects with a Ki-67 <10 %.
‡Patients who had a PET scan with gallium.
Conclusions
Baseline CLARINET FORTE data highlight the high rate of G1 in progressive midgut NET and of G2 in panNET. The cohort is representative of typical patients requiring treatment intensification due to progressive panNET or midgut NET. Final analyses are expected in Q1 2020, which will provide efficacy and safety data on use of LAN 120 mg at an increased dosing frequency. 1. Somatuline autogel SmPC. November 2018.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02651987.
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by Louise Cully of Ashfield Healthcare and funded by Ipsen.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Ipsen.
Funding
Ipsen.
Disclosure
P. Ruszniewski: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: AAA; Advisory / Consultancy: Keocyt. J. Ćwikła: Advisory / Consultancy, PI in Poland for this study: Ipsen. C. Lombard-Bohas: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis. I. Borbath: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer ; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene. T. Shah: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. U. Pape: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis. X. Truong Thanh: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. A. Houchard: Full / Part-time employment: Ipsen. M.E. Pavel: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lexicon.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract