Abstract 4840
Background
Recently, erdafitinib (erda), a novel FGFR-targeted therapy received accelerated US FDA approval for locally-advanced or mUC in adult pts with FGFR2/3 alterations who progressed on prior 1st-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. The current analysis was performed to understand treatment response to prior and subsequent therapies in FGFR+ mUC pts treated with erda.
Methods
Pts with surgically unresectable mUC who had failed ≥1 prior chemotherapy and received 8 mg once-daily erda in a phase 2 study (NCT02365597) were retrospectively assessed. Pts were grouped as cisplatin (C)-eligible (received 1st-line gemcitabine [G]-C or MVAC [methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/C]) or C-ineligible (received 1st-line G-carboplatin or checkpoint inhibitors). Treatment duration, time to progression (TTP) and response to prior chemotherapy (objective response rate [ORR] and disease control rate [DCR]), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and subsequent response after erda therapy were assessed using investigator reported outcomes.
Results
In this analysis, the median duration of treatment (time from 1st dose of 1st line to 1st dose of 2nd line) with 1st-line chemotherapy was 10.07 months for C-eligible (n = 52) and 8.02 months for C-ineligible (n = 34) pts; 31 pts received prior 2nd-line chemotherapy (median treatment duration: 9.23 months) and 10 received 3rd-line chemotherapy (median treatment duration: 6.26 months). The median TPP for prior 1st-line therapy was longer than on 2nd or 3rd-line therapy (Table). In total, 34 patients received treatment (chemotherapy, n = 19; immunotherapy, n = 15) after erda and had median PFS of 2.27 months (95% CI: 0.79; 2.86) and median OS of 3.52 months (95% CI: 2.04; 8.90).Table:
925P Efficacy results on prior and subsequent treatments
Prior therapy | Median TTP (95% CI), months | ORR (CR+PR) (%) | DCR (CR+PR+ SD) (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1st-line chemotherapy (n = 84) | 7.34 (5.91; 8.80) | 28/84 (33.3) | 49/84 (58.3) |
C-eligible | 8.84 (6.37; 10.38) | 18/52 (34.6) | 31/52 (59.6) |
C-ineligible | 6.59 (3.06; 7.49) | 9/34 (26.5) | 18/34 (52.9) |
2nd-line chemotherapy (n = 31) | 7.13 (3.78; 9.36) | 11/31 (35.5) | 21/31 (67.7) |
2nd-line D/V/P | 7.13 (3.06; 10.48) | 6/16 (37.5) | 10/16 (62.5) |
3rd-line chemotherapy (n = 10) | 5.70 (2.33; 8.64) | 2/10 (20.0) | 5/10 (50.0) |
3rd-line D/V/P | 5.55 (2.99; 9.46) | 1/7 (14.3) | 3/7 (42.9) |
Therapy after erda (n = 34) | ORR (%) | DCR (%) | |
1st-line after erda | 1/34 (2.9) | 3/34 (8.8) | |
1st-line chemotherapy | 0/16 | 0/16 | |
1st-line immunotherapy | 1/15 (6.7) | 3/15 (20.0) | |
2nd-line after erda | 1/9 (11.1) | 1/9 (11.1) | |
2nd-line chemotherapy | 0/7 | 0/7 | |
2nd-line immunotherapy | 1/2 (50.0) | 1/2 (50.0) |
CR, complete response; D/V/P, docetaxel/vinflunine/paclitaxel; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Conclusions
These results provide insights into treatment responses in a unique population of FGFR+ mUC pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02365597.
Editorial acknowledgement
Priya Ganpathy, MPharm, ISMPP CMPP™ (SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd., India) provided writing assistance and Harry Ma, PhD (Janssen Global Services, LLC) provided additional editorial support.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Funding
Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Disclosure
A.O. Siefker-Radtke: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Merck, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Eisai, Genentech, Vertex, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (self): National Institutes of Health, Genentech, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Millennium, Michael and Sherry Sutton Fund for Urothelial Cancer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Genentech. B. Zhong: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development. K. Qi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development. W.S. Shalaby: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development. P. De Porre: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development. A. O’Hagan: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development, LLC. P. Mahadevia: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Employee and stockholder: Janssen Research & Development. Y. Loriot: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas Oncology; AstraZeneca; Ipsen; Janssen; MSD; Roche; Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi (Inst); Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; MSD; Roche.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract