Abstract 3863
Background
One third of early breast cancers (EBC) in women are diagnosed over 70 years (y) old. In this population, clinicians look not only at EBC characteristics but also antecedents and comorbidities to determine the best treatment.
Methods
ConSoRe is a new generation data analytics solution using natural language processing and perform advanced data mining. It was used for data extraction from electronic patient record of 2048 patients (pts) of more than 70 years, operated for EBC in Centre Leon Berard since 1997. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment and survival were extracted.
Results
Mean age was 75.5 y (range 70-100 y). Main comorbidities described were coronary heart disease: 340 pts (16,6%) and diabetes: 321 pts (15,7%). Distribution of body mass index (BMI) was under 18.5: 56 pts (3,3%), 18.5-25: 677 pts (39,6%); 25-30: 620 (36,3%) and over 30: 356 (20,8%). Mean tumor size was 23,5 mm (range 6 to 150), SBR grading was distributed as well: grade 1: 317 (17%) ; grade 2: 1007 (55%) ; grade 3: 476 (26%) while estrogen receptor were positive (>10%) in 1553 pts (86%), progesteron receptor positive (>10%) in 1299 pts (71%) and HER2 positive in 101 pts (6,3%). Histological nodes staging was N0 in 1497 pts (72%); N1 in 414 pts (20%); N2 in 95 pts (5%); N3 in 52 pts (2%). 295 pts (14%) were treated by chemotherapy, 80 pts (3,9%) by trastuzumab, 1544 pts (75%) by radiotherapy and 1543 (75%) by hormonotherapy. Despite a limited mean follow-up of 5,1 y (range 0.3-20,7y), we observe 83 local relapse (4%), 144 metastatic relapse (7%) and 261 deaths (12.7%) with a mean overall survival (OS) of 4,6 y (10 days to 21,4 y). In the multivariate analysis, BMI under 19 and HER 2 positive were independent predictors of OS (HR: 0,85; p = 2.49e-09). Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis, percentage of explained variances is very low with less than 10%. These results show the limit of classical approach by descriptive data analysis, that is why, we propose new method by machine learning and operational research to determine the best adjuvant treatment.
Conclusions
This elderly population has a poor prognosis for which taking BMI into account is important when defining the therapeutic strategy. Classical approaches by data analysis reach their limits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Heudel Pierre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Heudel: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution): novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. O. Tredan: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): novartis; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): lilly; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract