Abstract 4689
Background
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for early prediction of relapse across different tumor types. In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), multiple studies have analyzed ctDNA to monitor tumor burden using fixed gene panels and droplet digital PCR. Here, we use a highly sensitive and specific, bespoke, whole exome-based NGS approach (Signatera™) for ctDNA monitoring.
Methods
A cohort of 33 patients with stage III CRC who underwent surgery and were treated with at least 4 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed. Mutational profiles derived from primary tumor tissue and germline DNA whole exome were used to design assays targeting tumor-specific somatic variants. The bespoke assays were used for ctDNA detection in plasma samples. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was calculated for patients stratified by ctDNA status.
Results
Plasma samples (n = 44; average volume=1.8mL) from patients (N = 33) were analysed for the presence of ctDNA. Of the five ctDNA-positive patients, clinical follow-up was available for three patients, all of whom relapsed (100%; 3/3); three of 27 ctDNA-negative patients (11%) also clinically relapsed. Molecular relapse through ctDNA analysis was detected up to 668 days ahead of radiological imaging with an average lead time of 305 days. The majority of relapses in ctDNA-positive patients (67%; 2/3) occurred within a year of follow-up, while no relapses were observed in ctDNA-negative patients during the one-year time frame. All plasma samples (n = 34) from 24 non-relapsing patients were ctDNA negative, corresponding to a specificity of 100%. The presence of ctDNA was associated with a markedly reduced RFS compared to ctDNA-negative patients (HR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.6-52.1; p < 0.01).
Conclusions
The study results indicate that ctDNA status is associated with high relapse risk in patients with CRC and can serve as a predictor of patient outcome. Despite low plasma volumes (<5mL) and lack of longitudinal samples for analysis, ctDNA was detected in 50% of relapse cases.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Natera, Inc. and NSABP Foundation.
Funding
Natera, Inc., Bayer, NSABP Foundation.
Disclosure
H. Sethi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. T.J. George: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pharmacyclics. S. Shchegrova: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. A.S. Tin: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. A. Olson: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. D. Renner: Full / Part-time employment: Natera, Inc. E. Kalashnikova: Full / Part-time employment: Natera, Inc. M. Louie: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. R. Salari: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. B. Zimmermann: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. A. Aleshin: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, I am an employee of Natera and own stock/options to stock.: Natera, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5520 - Patient’s Usability Test results of a CINV Diary Application For Smartphones
Presenter: Paz Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2323 - Colorectal Telephone Assessment Pathway (CTAP) - A viable means of shortening time to a definitive diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Harriet Watson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6119 - Cancer Nursing and Social Media: Capturing the Zeitgeist
Presenter: Mark Foulkes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1776 - Examination of mobile applications on breast cancer
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4128 - E-health effectiveness to increase patient adherence for immunotherapy; a cost-benefit study.
Presenter: Maria José Dias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3219 - Experiences of internet-based stepped care among individuals with recently diagnosed cancer and symptoms of anxiety and/or depression
Presenter: Anna Hauffman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5010 - What do cancer patients know about their immunotherapy treatment?
Presenter: Mónica Arellano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4503 - Prospective Comparison of Travel Burden, Cost and Time to Obtain Tumor Board Treatment Plan Through In-Person Visits vs. an AI Enabled Health Technology (N=1803)
Presenter: Rajendra Badwe
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4123 - Cancer care through the fire and flames: 3-year experience in the utilisation of electronic consultation and referral system at the Red Zone in Southern Thailand
Presenter: Nanthiya Rattanakhot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2087 - The effect of e-mobile education on the quality of life in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Derya ÇInar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract