Abstract 2150
Background
A decrease in AFP level during treatment has been associated with improved overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC. In the phase 3 RESORCE trial (NCT01774344), the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib significantly improved OS versus placebo in patients with HCC and disease progression on sorafenib. We analyzed OS in patients who had an AFP response in RESORCE.
Methods
Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C HCC, Child -Pugh A liver function, ECOG performance status 0 − 1, and documented radiologic progression on prior sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib 160 mg/day (n = 379) or placebo (n = 194) for Weeks 1-3 of each 4-week cycle. Serum AFP levels were assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks during treatment, and at the end of treatment. Patients who had a baseline AFP ≥20 ng/mL and an AFP measurement at the start of Cycle 3 were evaluable for AFP response, defined as a decrease of ≥ 20% in AFP level from baseline at the start of Cycle 3.
Results
Overall, 232 of the 573 randomized patients fulfilled the above criteria and were included in the analysis. Patients with an AFP response had a median OS from randomization of 13.8 months vs 8.9 months in those without an AFP response (Table). The rate of AFP response was 46% (77/168) in the regorafenib group and 11% (7/64) in the placebo group. Among regorafenib-treated patients, the median OS was 13.8 months in patients with an AFP response vs 9.8 months in those without an AFP response. A landmark analysis of OS from the start of Cycle 3 showed that the hazard ratios for AFP response vs no response were 0.57 (95% CI 0.40, 0.82) in the regorafenib and placebo arms combined and 0.72 (95% CI 0.48, 1.08) for patients in the regorafenib arm.Table:
755P
Regorafenib + /placebo arms combined | Regorafenib arm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 232) | (n = 168) | |||
AFP response (n = 84) | No AFP response (n = 148) | AFP response (n = 77) | No AFP response (n = 91) | |
Median OS (95% CI) from randomization, months | 13.8 (11.8, 16.5) | 8.9 (8.0, 9.7) | 13.8 (11.7, 16.5) | 9.8 (8.2, 14.2) |
HR (95% CI) AFP response yes/no | 0.57 (0.40, 0.82) | 0.72 (0.48, 1.07) | ||
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. |
Conclusions
In this exploratory analysis of RESORCE, an AFP response with regorafenib was associated with improved OS.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01774344.
Editorial acknowledgement
Jennifer Tobin of OPEN Health Medical Communications (London, UK), with financial support from Bayer.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bayer.
Funding
Bayer.
Disclosure
J. Bruix: Honoraria (self): Bayer; BTG; Eisai; Ipsen; Sirtex; Terumo; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie; Adaptimmune; Arqule; Astra-Medimmune; Basilea; Bayer; Bio-Alliance; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Eisai; Gilead; Incyte; Ipsen; Kowa; Lilly; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Nerviano; Novartis; Quirem; Roche; Sanofi Aventis; Sirtex; Terumo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; BTG. M. Reig: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; BTG; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Ipsen; Lilly; Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Gilead; Ipsen; Lilly. P. Merle: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Exelixis; Ipsen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Onxeo; Roche. M. Kudo: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Astellas Pharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Chugai; Daiichi Sankyo; EA Pharma; Eisai; Gilead; Medico’s Hirata; Otsuka; Taiho; Takeda. G. Meinhardt: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. M. Zhang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bayer; Full / Part-time employment: Bayer. K. Ozgurdal: Full / Part-time employment: Bayer.
Resources from the same session
5747 - The routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high risk DCIS lesions is not justified
Presenter: Fanny Preat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1837 - Oncological impact of re-excision for positive margin status after breast conserving surgery in invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Kenjiro Jimbo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4347 - Pneumonitis and fibrosis after breast cancer radiation.
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2280 - Prognosis of mastectomy with reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study in Korean Breast Cancer Society
Presenter: Sungmin Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
804 - A negative prognosis of radiotherapy-induced lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Chang-ik Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2701 - Patient data to monitor clinical patterns in early and advanced breast cancer in Europe
Presenter: Francesco Giusti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1437 - A critical appraisal of quality indicators of breast cancer treatment in Belgium
Presenter: Didier Verhoeven
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1534 - Predictors of adherence among post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Phillip Blanchette
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4363 - Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study
Presenter: Emilia Montagna
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2679 - Baseline Quality of life (QoL) and chemotherapy related toxicities (CRT) in localized breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): the French multicentric prospective CANTO cohort study
Presenter: Idlir Licaj
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract