Abstract 2594
Background
Identifying low risk of disease recurrence in localised ccRCC is key for gatekeeping in the adjuvant therapy enrolment. Uncertainty increases the number of patients required for accrual to achieve statistical power. Current scoring systems are good at identifying very low and very high risk cohorts, but have not been proved to be as effective at accurately predicting disease recurrence in intermediate groups. These patients are perhaps those likely to benefit from intervention in addition to surgery, but many may be treated unnecessarily. Using digital pathology, image analysis and machine learning we sought to stratify for risk in this intermediate category.
Methods
Definiens Tissue studio and Developer XD were utilised for object thresholding to measure tumour cell nuclear morphological features on H&E digitised images from 120 ccRCC training set from UK and 217 ccRCC validation set from Singapore. Multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed on 120 cases to co-detect neo-vasculature and pan-T cells. An algorithm was derived to measure spatial relationships between blood vessels and T cells. A statistical model was developed by generalised linear model with spatially adaptive local smoothing algorithm, having specificity prefixed (0.8-1) plus cross validation.
Results
Replacing manual nuclear grade with AI aided tumour cell nuclear morphological features improved the specificity of Leibovich score (LS) from 0.76 to 0.86 and from 0.84 to 0.94 in training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, tumour microenvironment (TM) parameters significantly improved the specificity up to 0.93 in the training set. The negative predictive values of both LS 5 and 6 were zero, but by applying the algorithm the specificity for LS 5 and 6 cases became 0.93 and 0.40 respectively.
Conclusions
By applying image analysis it is possible to identify lower risk for recurrence patients in a conventionally identified intermediate risk group based on routine ccRCC H&E images, and multiplexed TM features. This approach to pathology should help refine selection of patients for clinical trials and form the basis of future AI-enabled prognostic and predictive algorithms in ccRCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Authors.
Funding
Renal Cancer Research Fund and NHS Lothian.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract