Abstract 2594
Background
Identifying low risk of disease recurrence in localised ccRCC is key for gatekeeping in the adjuvant therapy enrolment. Uncertainty increases the number of patients required for accrual to achieve statistical power. Current scoring systems are good at identifying very low and very high risk cohorts, but have not been proved to be as effective at accurately predicting disease recurrence in intermediate groups. These patients are perhaps those likely to benefit from intervention in addition to surgery, but many may be treated unnecessarily. Using digital pathology, image analysis and machine learning we sought to stratify for risk in this intermediate category.
Methods
Definiens Tissue studio and Developer XD were utilised for object thresholding to measure tumour cell nuclear morphological features on H&E digitised images from 120 ccRCC training set from UK and 217 ccRCC validation set from Singapore. Multiplexed immunofluorescence (mIF) was performed on 120 cases to co-detect neo-vasculature and pan-T cells. An algorithm was derived to measure spatial relationships between blood vessels and T cells. A statistical model was developed by generalised linear model with spatially adaptive local smoothing algorithm, having specificity prefixed (0.8-1) plus cross validation.
Results
Replacing manual nuclear grade with AI aided tumour cell nuclear morphological features improved the specificity of Leibovich score (LS) from 0.76 to 0.86 and from 0.84 to 0.94 in training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, tumour microenvironment (TM) parameters significantly improved the specificity up to 0.93 in the training set. The negative predictive values of both LS 5 and 6 were zero, but by applying the algorithm the specificity for LS 5 and 6 cases became 0.93 and 0.40 respectively.
Conclusions
By applying image analysis it is possible to identify lower risk for recurrence patients in a conventionally identified intermediate risk group based on routine ccRCC H&E images, and multiplexed TM features. This approach to pathology should help refine selection of patients for clinical trials and form the basis of future AI-enabled prognostic and predictive algorithms in ccRCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Authors.
Funding
Renal Cancer Research Fund and NHS Lothian.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract