Abstract 4561
Background
Discrepancies in perception of adverse events between patients and physicians may influence the follow up services of cancer patients. With patient ratings as the gold standard, physicians more often underrate the symptom severities. In breast cancer (BC) populations, studies of interrater agreement are deficient. We evaluated the agreement between BC patients and their oncologists on the rating of symptoms and functioning in a clinical follow-up study at Trondheim University Hospital.
Methods
At five clinical controls during the first year after primary treatment BC patients (n = 250) and their oncologist (n = 14) reported symptoms and functions by completing the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BR23 and CTCAE questionnaires, respectively. Fatigue, hot flushes, breast pain, arm pain, emotional and physical functioning were comparable and scored on a four point Likert scale: not at all, mild, moderate and severe. The degree of agreement was evaluated by the Kappa(κ) coefficient. The McNemar-Bowker Test was used to test for association between raters and rating outcome.
Results
Four symptoms and two functions were assessed five times. Of 35 assessments, poor agreement (κ < 0.20) was identified on 24 assessments, fair agreement (0.21< κ > 0.40) on 10 assessments and moderate agreement (κ = 0.41) on one assessment (physical function). Overall, the oncologists rated the severity of all symptoms and the functions significantly lower than the patients (p < 0.01). The agreement decreased with increasing symptom severity and function impairment.
Conclusions
Discrepancies in reporting symptom severity between patients and oncologists might be due to high subjectiveness of symptoms and different understanding of the construct being measured. Personal characteristics of both raters, the context of the clinical controls and the nature of the relationship between patients and physicians may also contribute to discrepancies. Our results emphasize the importance of collecting patient reported data during follow up after BC treatment as it may improve diagnosis and treatment of adverse effects.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
NTNU, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, the authors.
Funding
Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract