Abstract 3171
Background
New efficacious systemic therapies for advanced melanoma have been practice changing. More recently these therapies have been tested in the adjuvant setting for stage III disease with positive results. With recent FDA and EMA approvals for stage III disease we wished to evaluate current uptake of adjuvant therapies for stage III melanoma. Such benchmark data will be important in testing our ability to integrate clinical trial data into clinical practice.
Methods
We identified 34,376 stage III patients from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed 2004-2015 with known extent of LN surgery and no prior invasive cancer. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (including targeted therapy), immunotherapy and radiation therapy was assessed. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to test for changes in proportions over time overall and stratified by substage.
Results
Of the 34,376 patients, median age 57 years, 21,093 (61.4%) were male and 33,300 Caucasian (97.7%). The median (mean) number of positive nodes was 1 (2.1), IQR 1-2, range 1-81. Overall, 9,180 patients (27.4%) received adjuvant immunotherapy, 2,467 (7.5%) adjuvant chemotherapy and 3,088 (9.1%) adjuvant radiation. Any adjuvant therapy use declined over time from 41.9% in 2004 to 35.8% in 2015 (p < 0.001), as did immunotherapy specifically (30.6% in 2004 to 25.3% in 2015, p < 0.001). Use of any adjuvant therapy correlated with disease burden (49.9% for ≥2LN+ vs 34.6% for 1LN+, p < 0.001) and substage: Stage IIIA 33.3%, Stage IIIB 38.8%, Stage IIIC 51.7%. Use of any adjuvant therapy significantly decreased from 2004 to 2015 in both IIIA (39.9% to 22.9%) and IIIB substages (44.0% to 35.4%), each p < 0.001, while stable among Stage IIIC patients (50.6% to 52.4%, p = 0.50). Use of immunotherapy followed a similar trend (Stage IIIA 33.4% to 19.1%, p < 0.001, Stage IIIB 31.1% to 27.5%, p < 0.001, Stage IIIC 30.6% to 31.7%, p = 0.76).
Conclusions
These data provide benchmarks for adjuvant therapy uptake for stage III melanoma patients reflective of general clinical practice. Future study with integration of adjuvant systemic therapies tested in clinical trials into the general cancer population should utilize these data to test the uptake of newer adjuvant treatments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract