Abstract 4433
Background
Cancers presenting with ‘vague symptoms’ are difficult to diagnose. These non-specific but serious symptoms (weight loss, anorexia, pain, fatigue) have a number of causes including malignancy. The risk for each individual cancer may be low, but the total risk of cancer of any type is higher. Patients diagnosed with cancer as the result of an emergency presentation (EP) to secondary care have poorer survival, usually describe a long history of symptoms, and most have seen their general practitioner (GP) prior to presentation. Earlier diagnosis improves cancer outcomes. But investigating vague symptoms is challenging, requiring both oncology and general medical knowledge, while bespoke rapid-access oncology diagnostic clinics are needed to avoid EP.
Methods
The Acute Diagnostic Oncology Clinic was established at Chelsea & Westminster Hospital in 2016. It initially provided rapid access investigations for those too ill to wait for an urgent suspected cancer appointment, as an alternative to the Emergency Department (ED). In February 2018 the clinic expanded to, uniquely, include a GP with specialist interest in oncology and patients with ‘vague symptoms’.
Results
361 referrals were received, 65% were female. Weight loss was the commonest vague symptom (50%). Initially, 96% of patients were seen within 24 hours of referral, falling to 69% after expansion of the clinic remit in 2018. 34% of patients (from 2018, 21%) were diagnosed with cancer. Mean time from referral to diagnosis was 4 days, and to starting cancer treatment it was 20 days. A range of cancers were identified, lung the commonest, and advanced stage disease the most likely. A number of significant non-malignant conditions were diagnosed. One-third of patients provided feedback. Only 37% were told at referral that cancer was suspected. The service was rated Excellent or Very Good in all cases. 84% valued being seen urgently. Feedback was received from 40 GPs. 100% would use the service again. Alternate referral routes would have been routine cancer referral (60%) or ED (13%).
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the only GP-oncology led rapid access cancer diagnostic clinic. Combining general medical and oncology expertise is an effective approach for diagnosing patients with vague symptoms and tackling EP cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
CW+ Healthcare Charity.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract