Abstract 4319
Background
Thymic Epithelial Tumors (TETs) are rare entities, which can be diagnostic challenges for Pathologists. It has been proven that patients’ referral to a Center with an expert Pathologist is a key factor in obtaining the correct diagnosis. As therapeutic options vary widely for the different entities of TET spectrum, an accurate diagnosis is essential in the therapeutic planning. We aimed at investigating this topic, analyzing pathologic second opinions in a single reference Centre.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed all the cases which obtained a pathologic second opinion, after being diagnosed elsewhere with a TET or for a suspicion of TET, at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy, between 2010 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were used for qualitative variables. Concordance between diagnoses was estimated through Cohen’s k.
Results
We identified 278 cases; 72 of them received a pathologic revision in INT. Among these cases, initial diagnosis was thymoma A in 5 cases, thymoma AB in 3 cases, thymoma B1 in 5 cases, thymoma B2 in 15 cases, thymoma B3 in 7 cases, thymoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) in 8 cases, thymic carcinoma in 17 cases, carcinoma NOS in 8 cases, carcinoma with different histology in 3 cases, lymphoblastic lymphoma in one case. INT pathologic revision changed the diagnosis in 41 (56.9%) cases, with a potential shift in therapeutic approach in 32 (44.4%). In particular, 12 cases of carcinoma NOS or lymphoma were reviewed as thymic carcinoma (10 cases) or thymoma (2 cases); 9 cases of thymic carcinoma were reviewed as cases of thymoma (7 B3, 2 B2); 11 cases of thymoma were reviewed as different thymoma subtypes (9 cases), or thymic carcinoma (one case), or diffuse large B cell lymphoma (one case). Concordance between Pathologists was moderate when the initial diagnosis was thymoma (74.7%, k 0.447), only slight when the initial diagnosis was thymic carcinoma (60.5%, k 0.139).
Conclusions
A change in histological characterization was documented in a significant percentage of cases initially diagnosed in other Centers, not rarely with potential therapeutic implications. Therefore, in the approach to TETs as well as for other rare diseases, patients’ referral to a reference Centre with high pathology expertise is strongly recommended.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Proto: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD International GmbH; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly. D. Signorelli: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD International GmbH; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS. F.G.M. de Braud: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer-Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ignyta; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer. M.C. Garassino: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD International GmbH; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ignyta; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Inivata; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedImmune; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda; Honoraria (institution): Tiziana; Honoraria (institution): Foundation Medicine; Research grant / Funding (institution): AIRC; Research grant / Funding (institution): AIFA; Research grant / Funding (institution): Italian Moh; Research grant / Funding (institution): Transcan. G. Lo Russo: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD International GmbH; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract