Abstract 724
Background
Screening and management of distress are essential. The Distress thermometer (DT) is a common screening tool. However, it’s cutoff score and the accuracy properties such as sensitivity and specificity is still unclear in Chinese cancer patients.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, DT was compared against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in 784 heterogeneous cancer inpatients. The HADS cutoff score ≥15, ≥6, and ≥9 were used to define distress, anxiety, and depression respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to determine the discriminative accuracy of DT against each scale.
Results
When DT was compared against HADS-T, ROC showed an excellent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.903. The optimal cutoff score of 4 yielded sensitivity (SE)=89.3%, specificity (SP)=85.8%, positive predictive value (PPV)=89.9%, negative predictive value (NPV)=85.0%, screening utility (UI-)=.729, and case-finding utility (UI+)=.802. Furthermore, compared With HADS subscales, AUC=0.801 with a cutoff score 3 on DT optimally detected SE = 80.7%, SP = 64.5% PPV=89.4%, NPV=47.3%, UI-=.369, andUI + =.721 for anxiety and AUC=0.802 with a cutoff score of 4 on DT optimally detected SE = 88.3%, SP = 65.3%, PPV=66.4%, NPV=87.8%, UI-=.573 and UI + =.586 for depression respectively. DT Scores were moderately correlated with HADS-Total, HADS-Anxiety, andHADS-Depression. Female gender, low education level, advanced cancer stage, no exercise habit, suicidal ideation and months since diagnosis more than 12 were found to be associated with distress.
Conclusions
For Chinese patients with cancer, DT is an efficacious screening and case finding a tool for distress. Among the subscales, DT performed well in both screening and case finding for depression, however, although the case finding was good it carried a poor screening ability for anxiety.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4369 - Biomarker testing of lung cancer in Spain
Presenter: Delvys Rodriguez Abreu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
603 - Mendelian Randomization Study of Alzheimer's Disease and Lung Cancer
Presenter: Huaqiang Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4462 - Spanish registry of thoracic tumors (TTR): Interim analyses of comorbidities, risk associations, personal and family history of cancer
Presenter: Rafael Lopez Castro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3957 - Pleural effusion TGF-beta is highly diagnostic and prognostic in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Paul Stockhammer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3583 - Immune microenvironment modulation by p14/ARF in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Presenter: Giulia Pasello
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4255 - Tumor Treating Fields plus chemotherapy for first-line malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): radiological responses in the STELLAR trial
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1803 - Effects of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 150 kHz) and Cisplatin or Pemetrexed Combination Therapy on Mesothelioma cells In Vitro and In Vivo
Presenter: Mijal Munster
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2660 - Real world use of systemic therapy in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)
Presenter: Susana Cedres
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3150 - Pemetrexed/Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine/Cisplatin as first-line treatment for Egyptian patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
Presenter: Mohamed Alorabi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4319 - Accuracy of pathologic evaluation for thymic epithelial tumors in an Italian reference Centre
Presenter: Giulia Galli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract