Abstract 2435
Background
BRAF V600 mutations occur in 40-50% of metastatic melanomas as the most common "oncogenetic driver" event. Currently, BRAF V600 mutation status is assessed on tumor tissue to identify patients eligible for treatment with a BRAF+/-MEK inhibitor. The goal of this study is to estimate the frequency of the BRAF V600 mutation in a new tumor tissue analysis triggered by a mutant plasma test result, for patients with BRAF wild-type status based on a prior tissue test.
Methods
This is a single arm, multicenter, open label, non-randomized Phase II clinical study in adult patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. Patients were tested for the presence of BRAF V600 mutation using the IdyllaTM diagnostic platform on plasma cfDNA. In patients with a prior tissue BRAF V600 wild-type result, a mutant BRAF V600 plasma result triggered a new tissue analysis. The study had a power of 90% to reject the null hypothesis of a 3% probability of identifying the BRAFV600 mutation in case the real probability is 10%.
Results
172 patients with known tissue test results were included (9.3% unresectable Stage IIIc and 90.7% Stage IV). The median time since diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was 19.3 (range: 0–268)) months. In 7 out of 118 patients (5.9%), previously determined as wild type BRAF V600 based on a tumor tissue test, a BRAF V600 mutation was found upon plasma cfDNA testing. In 5 of these 7 patients, presence of a BRAF V600 mutation could be confirmed in the tissue re-test. For 4.2% (5/118) the mutation could be shown in a re-test triggered by the mutant plasma cfDNA result. The one-sided test comparing this frequency with the a priori hypothesis of 3% was not significant (p = 0.215).
Conclusions
In 4.2% of the patients a known BRAF V600 wild-type status could be converted in a positive mutant status by retesting tumor tissue triggered by detection of a BRAF V600 mutation in cfDNA. Some patients could therefore benefit from plasma testing at the time of therapeutic decision making, although their number was not significantly more than the a priori required 3%. Identifying a BRAFwt subpopulation with the highest chance of having a BRAF V600mut cfDNA test result at the time of treatment decision making deserves further study.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02768207.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Roche.
Funding
Roche.
Disclosure
P. Rutkowski: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Blueprint Medicines; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly. B. Jacobs: Full / Part-time employment: Biocartis. G.G. Maertens: Full / Part-time employment: Biocartis. V. Gadeyne: Full / Part-time employment: Roche. S. Liebert: Full / Part-time employment: Roche. B. Neyns: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Honoraria (institution): Merck Srono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Honoraria (institution): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2963 - Analytical performance of the Resolution-HRD plasma assay used to identify mCRPC patients with biallelic disruption of DNA repair genes for treatment with niraparib
Presenter: Ira Pekker
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3523 - Results of a global external quality assessment scheme for EGFR testing on liquid biopsy
Presenter: Nicola Normanno
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3295 - Clinical impact of plasma Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Laura Bonanno
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5632 - Feasibility study of a ctEGFR prototype assay on the fully automated Idylla™ platform
Presenter: Martin Reijans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3614 - Enhanced Access to EGFR Molecular Testing in NSCLC using a Cell-Free DNA Tube for Liquid Biopsy
Presenter: Theresa May
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5664 - Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in paired plasma and sputum samples of EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients
Presenter: Christina Grech
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4945 - Liquid biopsy and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH)
Presenter: Panagiotis Apostolou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5746 - Next-generation sequencing panel verification to detect low frequency single nucleotide and copy number variants from mixing cell line studies
Presenter: Rocio Rosas-Alonso
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5901 - Automated rarefaction analysis for precision B and T cell receptor repertoire profiling from peripheral blood and FFPE-preserved tumor
Presenter: Luca Quagliata
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2027 - A Heptamethine cyanine dye is a potential diagnostic marker for Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
Presenter: Chaeyong Jung
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract