Abstract 3973
Background
In most SCCHN patients receiving palliative treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, the tumor eventually progresses and requires further treatment options. PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was authorized in this setting in 2017 after proving superior to single agent chemotherapy in objective response and overall survival. But there are still patients who progress rapidly with nivolumab monotherapy. In this population, prompt escalation of immunotherapy by adding the CTLA-4 antagonist ipilimumab to nivolumab may be beneficial, as this combined checkpoint blockade has proven superior to nivolumab alone in several tumors. It is not clear, though, if combined immunotherapy is superior to chemotherapy in this setting of SCCHN patients responding poorly to nivolumab alone. The OPTIM trial investigates this question.
Trial design
280 patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy or within 6 months after RCT will be recruited at 24 German sites. All patients initially receive nivolumab monotherapy according to current prescribing information (240 mg Q2W). They are closely followed for tumor progression by radiologic assessment every 4-6 weeks, i.e. at increased frequency compared to standard of care. Patients who progress during the first 24 weeks of nivolumab monotherapy are randomized 1:1 between intensified immunotherapy (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W) and chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W). 157 patients are planned to be randomized. Patients who do not progress during the first 24 weeks of nivolumab monotherapy continue treatment according to standard of care. After randomization, study treatment continues until disease progress or for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is overall response rate after randomization, hypothesizing that dual checkpoint blockade improves ORR to 25% compared to 10% with docetaxel. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, and quality of life. Recruitment started in July 2018 and is ongoing.
Clinical trial identification
2017-003349-14.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Berlin.
Funding
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
V. Grünwald: Full / Part-time employment: University Hospital Essen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Cerulean; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: COCS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: EUSAPharm; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): EISAI; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedUpdate; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedKomAkademie; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: NewConceptOncology; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Johnson & Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PharmaMar; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PeerVoice; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: StreamedUp!; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ThinkWired!. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3117 - A modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale for assessing symptoms in one day chemotherapy clinic
Presenter: Anjuleta Kampitsi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6058 - Level of physical activity and nutritional status in cancer patients with fatigue: an exploratory cross-sectional study
Presenter: Patrick Jahn
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1980 - Catheter related necrotizing fascitiis in haematological patients. Case report and implications for nursing
Presenter: Arianna Rosich Soteras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3984 - Everyday life with Long-term Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy among Patient in Adjuvant Treatment for Colorectal Cancer – a Multi Methods Study
Presenter: Marlene Jensen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2202 - Scalp cooler is effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced alopecia among breast cancer patients : a single institution experience
Presenter: Emilia Gianotti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5942 - Nursing management of fatigue in cancer patients: mixed methods study
Presenter: Angela Tolotti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2930 - Awareness of Nursing Students about the Warning Signs of Cancer
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2978 - Assessment of quality of life in patients with cancer and diabetes 2 in Northern Greece.
Presenter: STYLIANI MICHALOPOULOU
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3400 - Radiation dose variables related to the causes of skin toxicities in women with breast cancer: a study proposal
Presenter: EULALIA PUJOL
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2156 - How should the symptoms be managed after breast cancer surgery? An example of mobile app
Presenter: AYDANUR AYDIN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract