Abstract 3973
Background
In most SCCHN patients receiving palliative treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, the tumor eventually progresses and requires further treatment options. PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab was authorized in this setting in 2017 after proving superior to single agent chemotherapy in objective response and overall survival. But there are still patients who progress rapidly with nivolumab monotherapy. In this population, prompt escalation of immunotherapy by adding the CTLA-4 antagonist ipilimumab to nivolumab may be beneficial, as this combined checkpoint blockade has proven superior to nivolumab alone in several tumors. It is not clear, though, if combined immunotherapy is superior to chemotherapy in this setting of SCCHN patients responding poorly to nivolumab alone. The OPTIM trial investigates this question.
Trial design
280 patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy or within 6 months after RCT will be recruited at 24 German sites. All patients initially receive nivolumab monotherapy according to current prescribing information (240 mg Q2W). They are closely followed for tumor progression by radiologic assessment every 4-6 weeks, i.e. at increased frequency compared to standard of care. Patients who progress during the first 24 weeks of nivolumab monotherapy are randomized 1:1 between intensified immunotherapy (nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W) and chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W). 157 patients are planned to be randomized. Patients who do not progress during the first 24 weeks of nivolumab monotherapy continue treatment according to standard of care. After randomization, study treatment continues until disease progress or for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is overall response rate after randomization, hypothesizing that dual checkpoint blockade improves ORR to 25% compared to 10% with docetaxel. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, safety, and quality of life. Recruitment started in July 2018 and is ongoing.
Clinical trial identification
2017-003349-14.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AIO-Studien-gGmbH, Berlin.
Funding
Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
V. Grünwald: Full / Part-time employment: University Hospital Essen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Cerulean; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: COCS; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: EUSAPharm; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): EISAI; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedUpdate; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MedKomAkademie; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: NewConceptOncology; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Johnson & Johnson; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PharmaMar; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PeerVoice; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: StreamedUp!; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ThinkWired!. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract