Abstract 1563
Background
FOLFIRINOX (5FU, folinic acid [FA], irinotecan [Iri], oxaliplatin [Ox]) is a 1st-line standard in fit Pts with aPDAC. Anti-PD-(L)1 as single agents have failed in aPDAC and new combination immunotherapies are needed. Tedopi (OSE2101) is a multiple neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2 positive Pts targeting 5 tumor-associated antigens (ACE, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3, TP53) frequently expressed in PDAC. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Tedopi alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 nivolumab or FOLFIRI as maintenance therapy in aPDAC Pts after FOLFIRINOX induction CT.
Trial design
TEDOPaM is a 3-arm, Fleming 2-stage, open-label, randomized, non-comparative phase II study. 156 Pts with recurrent or advanced, pathologically proven PDAC; ECOG PS 0-1; HLA-A2 genotype; controlled disease (PR or SD) after 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX; adequate organ functions, are randomized (1:1:1, stratified on center, tumor stage, best response to FOLFIRINOX) into 3 arms:Table:
830TiP
Arm A (reference): FOLFIRI (n = 52) | IV; FA 400 mg/m2, Iri 180 mg/m2, 5FU bolus 400 mg/m2 + continuous 2400 mg/m2/46h |
Arm B: Tedopi (n = 52) | Subcutaneous injection on D1 Q3W/6 doses then Q8W until month 12 [M12] then Q12W up to M24 |
Arm C: Tedopi + nivolumab (n = 52) | Tedopi + nivolumab 360 mg IV on D1 Q3W/6 doses then 480 mg Q4W up to M24 |
In Arms B and C, reintroduction of FOLFIRI at disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: overall survival rate at M12. Secondary: progression-free survival (CT-scan Q8W), duration of disease control, safety, response rate, RECIST v1.1/iRECIST comparison, HRQoL, Q-TWiST. Interim analysis after inclusion of 20 Pts in each arm. Translational research on tumor tissue (initial FFPE biopsy and optional re-biopsy at inclusion): RNAseq (cancer and stroma), mutation burden, MMR status, immune infiltrates; and in blood (before and on-treatment): cytokine panel, PBMC phenotyping, vaccine-antigen specific T-cells, TCR repertoire, extracellular vesicles to explore biomarkers and pharmacodynamics effects of Tedopi ± nivolumab.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03806309.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
GERCOR.
Funding
OSE Immunotherapeutics.
Disclosure
C. Neuzillet: Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution), Not related to the abstract: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Not related to the abstract: MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, PI of the TEDOPaM Clinical Trial: OSE Immunotherapeutics; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Roche; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Servier. V. Hautefeuille: Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: AAA; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Merck; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Servier; Honoraria (self), Not related to the abstract: Lilly. A. Lambert: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck KGaA; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self): Servier/Pfizer. D. Vernerey: Advisory / Consultancy: OSE Immunotherapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: HalioDX; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: CellProthera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3248 - Second-line palliative systemic treatment for synchronous metastatic esophagogastric cancer: a population-based study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4331 - STING Agonist, ADU-S100, Yields Potent Antitumor Activity and Therapeutically Favorable Immune Profile in an Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Model
Presenter: Ali Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1770 - Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3755 - A new docetaxel (DOC)-based triplet regimen does not improve the outcome of metastatic (M) or locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer (GC) as compared with an epirubicin (EPI) standard triplet regimen: a GISCAD trial.
Presenter: Roberto Labianca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2439 - The analysis of T cell subsets and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades in patients with advanced gastric cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Tae-yong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2211 - First-line pembrolizumab (P), trastuzumab (T), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-positive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Presenter: Yelena Janjigian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3046 - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumor response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4628 - Gastric cancer screening in BRCA 2 gene mutation carriers: should it be recommended?
Presenter: Inês Oliveira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2127 - Interim analysis of an observational/translational study for nivolumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-08 (DELIVER trial)
Presenter: Yu Sunakawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2264 - Prediction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in Stage II/III gastric cancer treatment based on comprehensive gene expression analysis
Presenter: Masanori Terashima
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract