Abstract 4441
Background
Cryo is an effective intervention for palliation and local control for small primary and metastatic tumours in mRCC. Pre-clinical murine tumour modeling found cryo recruits effector immune cells and synergizes with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) to inhibit tumour rechallenge as compared to either therapy (tx) alone, leading to a prospective pilot study evaluating safety/tolerability.
Methods
NCT02626130 randomized pts to treme (CTLA-4) 10mg/kg every 4 weeks alone (arm A) or after cryo (arm B) for two doses followed by surgery (sx) or biopsy (bx) followed by maintenance treme. Best confirmed responses (ORR) were defined using RECIST v1.1, toxicity (tox) tabulated using CTCAE v4 with ≥ grade 3 adverse events (AE) possibly related reported, and time on study was defined as event free survival (EFS). Immune monitoring data (IMD): tissue based IHC, CyTOF, and RNA Nanostring.
Results
30 pts accrued, 29 pts received tx on study. More patients in Arm B had intermediate and poor risk disease as per IMDC criteria and had received >1 line of treatment as compared to Arm A leading to an imbalance between arms. Toxicity on study was similar between arms with six patients on each arm requiring treatment discontinuation due to AEs. IMD found clear cell histology (CC) had an inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME) with increased immune infiltration (IC) post treme in both arms compared to non-clear cell (NCC). CyTOF analysis identified an activated CD4+ T cell cluster expressing ICOS in the TME of CC pts compared to NCC.
Conclusions
Cryo+treme was tolerated similar to treme alone. IMD found a differential TME response to treme in CC vs NCC pts and in EFS >3 mo vs EFS <3 mo. Longer follow up is needed to determine impact of cryo in clinical efficacy endpoints.Table:
963P
Arm A n = 14 | Arm B n = 15 | |
---|---|---|
Histology Clear cell (CC) Non-clear cell (NCC) | 9 5 | 9 6 |
IMDC Good (CC/NCC) Intermediate Poor | 4 (4/0) 9 (5/4) 1 (0/1) | 0 11 (6/5) 4 (3/1) |
Prior nephrectomy | 7 (50%) | 5 (33%) |
Prior treatment 0 1 >1 | 10 2 2 | 10 0 5 |
Tissue collected | 6 sx, 4 bx, 4 no tissue | 5 sx, 4 bx, 6 NT |
ORR All (CC/NCC) PR SD PD Not measurable | 0 9 (7/2) 3 (2/1) 2 (0/2) | 1 (1/0) 4 (3/1) 5 (1/4) 5 (4/1) |
EFS mo (Arm A v Arm B) | 4.9 vs 3.2 (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.35-1.58) | |
EFS mo (CC v NCC) | 3.3 vs 2.9 (HR 1.16, HR 95%CI 0.54-2.51) | |
EFS > 6 mo, #pts, (range) | Arm A: 4 (7.6-29.9), Arm B: 3 (6.3-30.3) | |
EFS> 6 mo (range) CC v NCC | CC: 4 (11.7-30.3), NCC 3 (6.3-7.8) |
Clinical trial identification
NCT02626130.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AztraZeneca.
Disclosure
M.T. Campbell: Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Apricity Health LLC; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono, Inc; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech, Inc. E. Jonasch: Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Peloton; Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Exelixis; Honoraria (self): Genentech; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Roche. A.Y. Shah: Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Oncology Information Group; Honoraria (self): Roche Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract