Abstract 2852
Background
Although definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard of care for most of stage III NSCLC patients, neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery can be considered for some potentially resectable patients. Rationales for neoadjuvant treatment are tumor regression effect before surgery, early eradication of micrometastasis and better tolerability of chemotherapy than in the post-surgical setting. Regarding potential benefits of combining PD-1 blockade with CRT, here we have an ongoing phase Ib trial which assesses the safety and feasibility of the combination of neoadjuvant CRT with durvalumab in potentially resectable stage III NSCLC (NCT03694236).
Trial design
Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC (potentially resectable clinical stage III according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system) are enrolled. Patients receive CRT (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2 with radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions) and durvalumab (Day 1 and 29, 1500mg) during 5 weeks followed by surgery. After surgery, patients are treated with durvalumab for one year (every 4weeks, 1500 mg). The primary endpoints are safety and tolerability. The secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), clinical or pathological downstaging rate and, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the primary tumor. Immune marker analysis by FACS, exome sequencing and RNA sequencing using cancer tissue of pre-treatment, after surgery, and after recurrence will be performed.Table:
1477TiP
Steps of trial | No. of patients | Considerations | |
---|---|---|---|
Neoadjuvant (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2, radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions, durvalumab day 1 and 29, 1500mg) | Stage 11 | 9 | 1) If patients of ≥ 5 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial holds 2) If patients of ≤ 4 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial proceeds to the 2nd stage. |
Stage 2 | 21 | If patients of ≤ 13(43%) has grade≥3 TRAE during the neoadjuvant treatment it will be considered tolerable and further analysis will be performed.2 | |
Surgery | The time and modality of surgery will depend on the surgeon’s discretion. The maximum allowed interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery is 9 weeks. If disease progresses during or after the neoadjuvant therapy, or if the surgeon thinks that the surgery is not feasible, concurrent chemoradiation or chemotherapy alone can be continued. | ||
Adjuvant (durvalumab 1500mg for one year every 4 weeks, total of 13 times.) | The maximum allowed interval between the surgery and adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks. | ||
Follow up | Response evaluation will be done until 5 years after the surgery.3 (Chest CT every 3 months, Abdominal pelvic CT at 1, 2, 5 years after the surgery) |
Additional enrollment will be hold until the first 9 patients proceeds surgery.
2Grade≥3 TRAE during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is expected to be 30∼50% according to the previous data.
3Assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST), version 1.1. TRAE; treatment-related adverse event, CT; Computed tomography.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03694236.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5638 - Incidence of Vascular Thromboembolism Events in Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Single Institution Experience.
Presenter: Laura Gutiérrez Sainz
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5182 - High Incidence of Venous Thromboembolic Events (VTE) in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Presenter: Alaa Abufara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1504 - Weight Loss over Time in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a Landmark Analysis of 800+ Prospectively-Treated Patients
Presenter: Jennifer Le-rademacher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3972 - The prognostic significance of preoperative nutritional status in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Presenter: Salvatore Paiella
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2313 - Impact of Timing and Technique of Gastrostomy Placement on the Outcome of Patients (pts) with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC)
Presenter: M Julia Lostes Bardaji
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5219 - Clinical & nutritional determinants of quality of life in patients with incurable cancer
Presenter: Louise Daly
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4075 - Loss of skeletal muscle mass during palliative chemotherapy is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4159 - Impact of nutritional derangement on treatment outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (A-NSCLC) patients (pts).
Presenter: Ilaria Trestini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1210 - Sarcopenia and pretreatment anemia as prognostic factors for patients with localized muscle invasive bladder cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy
Presenter: Emilien Billon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2490 - Gender effect on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of anamorelin (ANAM) in healthy volunteers and cancer patients with cachexia
Presenter: Stein Kaasa
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract