Abstract 2533
Background
ICIs are pivotal therapies in the treatment of pts with R/M HNSCC. The dismal OS of some pts underscores the need to detect pre-treatment prognostic scores.
Methods
Pts with R/M HNSCC receiving pembrolizumab (P) or nivolumab (N) were included in this retrospective analysis. We analyzed the impact of the following pre-treatment variables for OS using a Cox proportional hazards regression model: drug type, age, sex, tumor site, line of therapy, p-16, albumin (alb), hemoglobin (Hb), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), lymphocyte count (LC), platelets (PLT), and neutrophil counts (NC).
Results
66 pts (55%) treated with N and 55 (45%) with P were included. Characteristics: Sex: Male 100 pts (83%), female 21 pts (17%); Mean Age: 62 (SD 11); Performance Status 0-1: 63 pts (52%), 2-3: 58 pts (48%); Line of therapy, 1: 43 pts (36%), 2: 58 pts (48%), 3-4: 20 pts (16%); P-16: positive 44 pts (36%), negative 77 pts (64%); Tumor site: oropharynx 54 pts (45%), oral cavity 23 pts (19%), larynx 16 pts (13%), other 28 pts (23%); Response: complete 11 pts (9%), partial 3 pts (2%), stable disease 47 pts (39%); and disease progression: 60 pts (50%). The OS at 1 and 2 years were 52% (95% confidence interval (CI), 43%-62%) and 27% (CI 17%-42%), respectively. Age, sex, PLT, NC, LC, p-16, alb, Hb, and LDH were included in the multivariable Cox model. Adjusted hazard ratio estimates are: P-16: 0.53 (CI 0.3-0.95, P = 0.03); LC: 0.67 (CI 0.46-0.97, P = 0.03); NC: 1.25 (CI 1.01-1.56, P = 0.04); LDH: 1.67 (CI 1.01-2.78, P = 0.04); Hb: 1.69 (CI 1.00-2.87, P = 0.05); alb: 1.69 (CI 0.94-3.02, P = 0.08); PLT: 1.06 (CI 0.82, 1.37, P = 0.7); Age: 1.02 (CI 0.78-1.34, P = 0.9); and Sex: 0.98 (CI 0.5-1.91, P = 0.9). This model was used to create a nomogram based prognostic score for 1 and 2 year OS probability and median OS time. Internal model validation using bootstrapped based bias corrected estimates showed Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.18, calibration slope of 0.67, and C-index of 0.7.
Conclusions
Pre-treatment LC, NC as well as LDH, Hb, alb, and p-16 had the largest impact on OS based on a prognostic nomogram. The nomogram may help treatment decisions regarding ICI use in this population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4596 - A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Encorafenib + Binimetinib Evaluating a Standard-dose and a High-dose Regimen in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastasis (MBM) (POLARIS)
Presenter: Michael Davies
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1891 - Continuation of annual screening mammograms and breast-cancer mortality in women over 70
Presenter: Xabier Garcia De Albeniz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5587 - Introducing standardized medical procedure and dynamic decision support program in precision oncology for the community of practice
Presenter: Istvan Petak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4757 - Effectively using primary care givers in oncology care through capacity building, task sharing and techno-mentoring.
Presenter: Dinesh Pendharkar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4497 - A single institution review of capecitabine related acute admissions and cost analysis
Presenter: Gemma Dart
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2187 - Health status of middle-aged and older cancer survivors in China: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
Presenter: Jiarui Li
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5101 - Crossed looks on lung cancer perception and knowledge from general public and physicians in France: results of a two-fold survey
Presenter: Céline Mascaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4354 - Knowledge and perception of clinical trials (CTs) and attitude towards participation among Polish oncological patients - A pilot survey
Presenter: Artur Kotowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3499 - Achieving best possible cancer treatment outcomes in care pathways through benchmarking; ABC-Benchmarking
Presenter: Anke Wind
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2270 - Impact of 10-day Fulbright Specialist Program (FSP) and Project Pink Blue (PPB) Education Sessions on Medical Oncology knowledge among Doctors that treat cancer in Nigeria
Presenter: Mike Martin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract