Abstract 2120
Background
Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a new pattern of tumor response described with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), characterized by a sharp acceleration of tumor growth after the administration of the treatment. Several definitions based on clinical and/or radiological criteria have been proposed, although different factors limit their applicability. The mechanistic rationale has still not been elucidated. Our group has monitored lymphocyte populations in peripheral blood from non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) under ICI treatment with flow cytometry, and correlated the findings with HPD.
Methods
41 NSCLC patients treated with ICI after progression to ≥ 1 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease have been included. We analyzed lymphocyte subpopulations from peripheral blood samples obtained immediately before the administration of the 1st and 2nd cycle of ICI. The expression of the following markers has been considered: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD27, CD28, CD45RA, CD62L, PD1. We correlated the findings with HPD as defined by TGR (Champiat S, 2017) and TGKR (Sâada-Bouzid E, 2017).
Results
Overall response rate (ORR) was 23.8%, and disease control rate (DCR) was 31%. 10 patients (23.8%) presented HPD by TGKR, and 7 patients (16.7%) by TGR. 9 patients (21.4%) could not be evaluated for HPD, mainly due to progression by non-measurable disease or death before further radiological. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was 6 weeks for HPD by TGR and 6.3 weeks by TGKR. We found that the mean proportion of post/pre-treatment LT CD4+ CD27- CD28- was significantly higher for HPD patients (1.86; CI95% 1.14 to 2.58 than non-HPD (1.09; CI95% 0.89 to 1.30) (p = 0.0033). An increase > 30% in LT CD4+/CD27-/CD28- after the first cycle of immunotherapy was associated with fast progression (ORR 0%, mPFS 6 weeks [CI95% 5.8 to 6.2], 8-weeks PFS 0%). Cohen’s kappa between HPD by TGR and by LT was 0.503 (p = 0.004).
Conclusions
HPD as defined by LT CD4+ CD27- CD28- burst > 30% might complement the limitations of radiological criteria as it does not require the evaluation of the tumor kynetics previous to the beggining of immunotherapy, nor it is influenced by non-measurable disease or tumor burden.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AECC, ISCIII.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract