Abstract 7194
Background
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) harbors a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) due to ultraviolet light-mediated DNA damage, and are highly immune-responsive. Cemiplimab, a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed death 1 (PD-1), is approved by the FDA and EMA as treatment for advanced CSCC patients who are not candidates for curative surgery. Here we explore the efficacy of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in CSCC- head and neck (HN) patients for whom surgery and radiation was planned.
Methods
Patients with stage III/IV (M0) (AJCC 8th Ed) CSCC-HN were treated with 2 doses of cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic response rate, safety and tolerability, and analysis of candidate biomarkers from pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor specimens.
Results
Twenty patients (18M, 2F) enrolled with median age 69 years (range: 42-88) and stage III (n = 8) or IV (n = 12) disease. Seven (35%) patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs); 6 (30%) grade 1 rash/pruritis, 1 (5%) grade 2 myalgia, and 1 (5%) grade 2 fatigue. There were no grade ≥ 3 AEs and no surgical delays. ORR by RECIST was 30% (6 partial response, 12 stable disease, 2 progressive disease). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 11 (55%) patients and major pathology response (MPR, ≤ 10% viable tumor) in an additional 3 (15%) patients. TMB and PD-L1 expression analyses in pre-treatment samples are in process. Eleven (55%) patients did not receive planned radiotherapy after surgery based on the pathologic responses. No recurrences have been observed with a median follow up of 3.8 months (range: 1.5-11.2).
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant cemiplimab was well-tolerated and induced a pCR or MPR in 70% of stage III/IV (M0) CSCC patients. A multicenter phase II study is planned to confirm these results and to describe the ability of neoadjuvant cemiplimab to allow less extensive treatment.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03565783.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Funding
Regeneron.
Disclosure
N. Gross: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy: PDS Biotechnology; Advisory / Consultancy: Intuitive Surgical. B.S. Glisson: Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): ISA Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours - Invited Discussant 1312PD and one LBA TBC
Presenter: Paolo Ascierto
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours - Invited Discussant 3 LBAs TBC
Presenter: Ana Arance
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours - Invited Discussant 1313PD and one LBA TBC
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours - Invited Discussant 1314PD, 1315PD, and 1316PD
Presenter: Salvador Martin Algarra
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Slides
Webcast