Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Discussion – Haematological malignancies

5328 - Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in HIV-positive patients treated with antiretroviral therapy and chemotherapy: a single institution retrospective study

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Discussion – Haematological malignancies

Presenters

Davide Dalu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v435-v448. 10.1093/annonc/mdz251

Authors

D. Dalu1, C. Fasola1, D. De Francesco2, G. Bombonati1, L. Ammoni1, N.M. La Verde1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 - Milan/IT
  • 2 Institute For Global Health, UCL, London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 5328

Background

HIV+ pts have a 25-fold higher risk of developing NHL. Two independent prognostic factors influence incidence and prognosis: highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and CD4+ lymphocyte count. Diagnosis of NHL can occur simultaneously (naive pts), or after diagnosis of HIV infection (experience-pts).

Methods

Single institution retrospective cohort study conducted in ASST FBF-Sacco Polo Luigi Sacco (Milan, Italy). Pts aged > =18 years, diagnosis of HIV infection and NHL, on HAART treated with first line R-CHOP-like chtp from Jan 2007 to Jan 2017. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact or Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, log-rank test or Cox regression model for OS, PFS and RR were used.

Results

We enrolled 46 HIV+ pts: 11 naive-pts, 35 experience-pts (exp-pts). No difference in median age at diagnosis (49vs48ys p = 0.40), sex (male 72.7vs85.7% p = 0.37), histological types: DLBCL (2vs24), BL (3vs3), PEL (1vs0), PCNSL (1vs0), PBL (2vs2) low-grade NHL (2vs4) T-cell NHL(0 vs 2) (p = 0.13). Naïve-pts higher stage (stage IV 90.9vs41.2% p = 0.05). No difference in frequency of B symptoms (40vs41% p = 0.99), bulky masses (18.2vs20.6% p = 0.99), ≥2 extranodal sites (45.5vs40% p = 0.61), CNS involvement (44.4vs38.2% p = 0.99), AIDS-definig diseases (44.4vs28.6% p = 0.43) HCV/HBV infection (p = 0.08/0.99). Naive-pts aaIPI intermediate-high risk (90.0vs58.1% p = 0.11). CD4+ count at NHL diagnosis(102vs222/mcl p = 0.05). During R-CHOP-like chtp naïve-pts more infectious toxicity (50% vs 10.7% p = 0.02). During a median (IQR 2-44) follow-up of 12 mts no difference in RR (CR 60% vs 62.5% p = 0.85), median OS (67 mts vs 69.4 mts p = 0.3) and PFS (p = 0.8).

Conclusions

The compromised immune status in naïve-pts may explain their worst NHL conditions at diagnosis and toxicity during chtp. The immediate start of HAART in combination with chemotherapy probably reduce the impact of these factors in term of response to treatment and survival (RR, PFS and OS). CD4+ count together with HAART remain the independent prognostic factor with the greatest influence on OS [exp vs naïve-pts: OS HR 0.83 (95% CI); OS/CD4+ HR 1.80 (95% CI)]. Naive-pts should be treated with standard chtp regimens, without modification of dose or schedule.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

ASST-FBF-SACCO.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.