Abstract 3521
Background
Though molecular classifications have been well studied, targeted therapies for GC are still limited. CDH1 mutations are characteristics of genomically stable GC and associated with poor prognosis. Herein, to understand the specific mutation profile and enriched pathways in CDH1-mutated (MT) GC could help to discover novel drug targets.
Methods
GC (N = 1596) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated based on somatic nonsynonymous mutation, and microsatellite instability (MSI) was evaluated by NGS of known MSI loci. Gene fusions were evaluated using Archer (N = 253) or Whole Transcriptome Sequencing (WTS, N = 96).
Results
The overall mutation frequency of CDH1 was 9.7%. A significant association of CDH1 mutations with cancer types (GC, 12% vs gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, 2%), sex (female, 13% vs male, 8%), Lauren subtypes (diffuse, 27% vs intestinal, 1%) and younger age (58 vs 62) were observed (p < 0.05). The most frequently mutated genes in CDH1-MT GC were ARID1A (55%), TP53 (44%), KMT2D (8%), RNF43 (7%), PIK3CA (6%). Compared to CDH1-wild type (WT) GC, mutations in ARID1A (55% vs 39%), WRN (3% vs 1%), POT1 (2% vs 0.1%), CDK12 (2% vs 0.6%) and FANCC (1.4% vs 0.2%) were significantly higher, while TP53 (44% vs 64%) and APC (2% vs 6%) were significantly lower in CDH1-MT GC (p < 0.05); Amplifications of KRAS and HER2 were significantly lower, while CRKL and IGF1R amplifications were significantly higher in CDH1-MT GC, compared to CDH1-WT GC (p < 0.05). For immune-related markers, CDH1-MT GC showed significantly lower rates of PD-L1 positivity (CPS score>0) (57% vs. 73%, p < 0.05). No significant difference of TMB and MSI-H were overserved between CDH1-MT/WT GC. RNA sequencing showed similar frequency of ARHGAP26 fusion (6% vs 7%) in CDH1-MT vs WT tumors.
Conclusions
This is the largest study to explore the distinct genomic landscape in CDH1-MT GC. It indicates CDH1-MT GC patients could potentially benefit from agents targeting WRN, POT1, CDK12 and IGF1R, while immunotherapy may be of lower efficacy in this cohort based on lower CPS score. Efficiency of these therapeutic targets and enriched pathways in CDH1-MT GC warrant further investigation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
6574 - Randomized, open-label, perioperative phase II study evaluating nivolumab alone versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable HCC
Presenter: Ahmed Kaseb
Session: Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant 673PD and 674PD
Presenter: Hanneke van Laarhoven
Session: Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA45, LBA46, 675PD and 676PD
Presenter: Florian Lordick
Session: Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant 677PD, 678PD, 679PD and 680PD
Presenter: Russell Petty
Session: Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal - Invited Discussant 681PD and LBA47
Presenter: Ana Raimundo
Session: Poster Discussion – Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast