Abstract 4332
Background
Previous data has shown that chemotherapy (CT)-induced amenorrhea was associated with a better DFS and OS in premenopausal patients with EBC, regardless of the hormone-receptor status (Swain et al. NEJM 2010 ).
Methods
740 patients (pts) aged ≤45yrs treated with anthracycline/taxane-based CT for EBC from 4 German neo-/adjuvant trials were included. Centrally assessed estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in paired blood samples collected at baseline and 4 weeks after the last therapy infusion were considered. CIOF was defined as estradiol <52.2 ng/L and FSH >12.4IU/l after CT for those pts with premenopausal hormone levels at baseline. 4-year DFS and OS (rate, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)) overall and in subgroups by hormone-receptor status (positive, negative) and age (≤30, 31-35, 36-40, >40yrs) are presented.
Results
Median follow-up was 49.6 (range 48.8-50.3) months. 4-year DFS and OS rates as well as HR overall and in subgroups are presented in the Table below. Pts with CIOF had a better DFS compared to pts without CIOF (HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.31-0.71). The DFS advantage was significant in pts with hormone-receptor positive (HR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.22-0.64) EBC. A trend towards a better OS was observed only for pts with hormone-receptor positive EBC (HR = 0.45, 95%CI 0.19-1.05). Within age groups, CIOF showed a statistically significant improvement in DFS only in women ≤30yrs (HR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.05-0.97). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed in any of the age groups. Only pts >40yrs showed a trend towards a better OS (HR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.11-1.16).Table:
180PD
DFS | OS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-year rate | log rank p-value | HR [95% CI] | 4-year rate | log rank p-value | HR [95% CI] | |||
CIOF | no CIOF | CIOF | no CIOF | |||||
overall (n = 740) | 84.4 | 65.0 | <0.001 | 0.47 [0.31-0.71] | 92.6 | 88.7 | 0.180 | 0.64 [0.33-1.23] |
hormone-receptor status | ||||||||
negative (n = 315) | 79.9 | 69.7 | 0.147 | 0.62 [0.32-1.19] | 88.9 | 89.3 | 0.879 | 0.92 [0.32-2.62] |
positive (n = 425) | 87.8 | 62.6 | <0.001 | 0.38 [0.22-0.64] | 95.5 | 88.7 | 0.059 | 0.45 [0.19-1.05] |
age (years) | ||||||||
≤30 (n = 62) | 92.8 | 69.5 | 0.027 | 0.21 [0.05-0.97] | 95.7 | 90.8 | 0.286 | 0.31 [0.03-3.00] |
31-35 (n = 100) | 80.4 | 59.9 | 0.099 | 0.49 [0.21-1.16] | 92.2 | 96.3 | 0.945 | 1.06 [0.22-5.15] |
36-40 (n = 205) | 81.8 | 63.5 | 0.119 | 0.54 [0.25-1.18] | 92.7 | 84.9 | 0.431 | 0.61 [0.17-2.13] |
>40 (n = 373) | 85.7 | 65.0 | 0.207 | 0.53 [0.19-1.45] | 92.4 | 81.3 | 0.072 | 0.35 [0.11-1.16] |
Conclusions
Pts with CIOF after anthracycline/taxane-based CT for EBC show a better DFS, especially in women with hormone-receptor positive EBC or younger than 30 years. The improvement in DFS translates in a survival advantage in pts with hormone-receptor positive EBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
German Breast Group (GBG).
Funding
The study was supported by Walter Schulz Stiftung.
Disclosure
A. Schneeweiss: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Research grant / Funding (institution): Molecular Partner; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): MSD Oncology; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly. C. Denkert: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Sividon Diagnostics; Honoraria (self): Teva; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo; Licensing / Royalties: VMScope digital pathology software; Licensing / Royalties: Patent application: EP18209672 - cancer immunotherapy; Licensing / Royalties: Patent application EP20150702464 - therapy response; Licensing / Royalties: Patent application EP20150702464 - therapy response. M. Untch: Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Abbvie; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Amgen GmbH; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution): BMS; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Celgene GmbH; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Daiji Sankyo; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Eisai GmbH; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Janssen Cilag; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Lilly; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: MSD Merck; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Mundipharma; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Myriad Genetics; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Odonate; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Pfizer GmbH; Honoraria (institution): PUMA Biotechnology; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche Pharma AG; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Sanofi Aventis Deutschland GmbH; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Sividon Diagnostics; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: TEVA Pharmaceuticals Ind Ltd; Honoraria (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Novartis. P.A. Fasching: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biontech; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): TEVA; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Honoraria (self): Myelo Therapeutics; Honoraria (self): Macrogenics; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): PUMA; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cepheid. F. Marmé: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Tesaro; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): PharmaMar; Honoraria (self): GenomicHealth; Honoraria (self): CureVac; Honoraria (self): EISAI; Honoraria (self): Clovis; Honoraria (self): Celgene. M. van Mackelenbergh: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Amgen. V. Müller: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Amgem; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Diichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Teva; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Janssen-Cilag; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genomic Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Hexal; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Nektar; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics. S. Loibl: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Seattle Genetics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Teva; Research grant / Funding (institution): Vifor; Research grant / Funding (institution): PRIME; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi; Licensing / Royalties: EP14153692.0 pending. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4132 - Prospective, multicenter registry trial to evaluate the clinical feasibility of targeted axillary dissection (TAD) in patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) and core biopsy proven axillary involvement (cN+)
Presenter: Mattea Reinisch
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
5429 - Long-term results of the PACS 04 trial evaluating adjuvant Epirubicin plus Docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer and Trastuzumab in the HER2-positive subgroup
Presenter: Veronique D'Hondt
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
3790 - Tumor size and overall survival in a cohort of young (_40 years), node negative, systemically untreated breast cancer patients; by the PARADIGM study group.
Presenter: Vincent De Jong
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
1375 - Improved survival of older patients with advanced breast cancer due to an increase in systemic treatments – a population-based study
Presenter: Nienke De Glas
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
4042 - Utility of the CPS+EG scoring system in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Frederik Marmé
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
4001 - Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with palbociclib in patients with high-risk breast cancer
Presenter: Per Eystein Lønning
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
3933 - Neoadjuvant olaparib monotherapy in primary triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Hans Eikesdal
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
1804 - Immunological differences between immune-rich estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancers
Presenter: Tess O'Meara
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage - Invited Discussant 179PD, 180PD and 181PD
Presenter: Laura Biganzoli
Session: Poster Discussion - Breast cancer, early stage
Resources:
Slides
Webcast