Abstract 3453
Background
ONCOLLEGE-001 project surveyed the global accessibility (ACC)/ affordability (AFF) to HER2-testing (H2T) & medicines for breast cancer (BC). The 1st analysis showed critical issues of ACC & AFF of H2T in lower- middle income countries. Part 2 of the survey focuses on ACC, AFF and prioritization of anti-HER2 medicines; here, we present the data for trastuzumab (T).
Methods
An internet-based survey was developed by the international ONCOLLEGE working group. Data were analyzed per country-income (World Bank groupings) and World Health Organization Regions. Responders authorized for the use of the data.
Results
Responses were received from 210 providers (78% medical or clinical oncologists) across 45 countries (all income groups, all regions). 8% of providers reported no T available in their setting, of which 60% are from low and low-middle income countries (LMICs) and the remaining from upper- middle (UMIC). Where T was available, 15% of the responders reported ACC only as out of pocket expenditure (OOP) for patients, of which almost 70% from LMICs. More than 2/3 of the responders described to order the H2T regardless ACC to affordable trastuzumab for patients, retaining the prognostic information of HER2- overexpression to inform treatment decision- making (e.g. risk grouping for early breast cancer). The patterns of reimbursement for T influenced the percentage of eligible HER2 patients receiving the anti-HER2 drug: T is received in more than 50% of the eligible population in 8%, 41% and 74% in LMIC, UMIC and HIC (high- income) settings, respectively. In 71% of settings where trastuzumab is provided only as OOP, <1/4 of the eligible patients could access affordable T.
Conclusions
The heterogeneous pattern of ACC and AFF of H2T & anti-HER2 medicines influenced the chance of breast cancer patients to receive T. Data on the use of trastuzumab biosimilars and other HER2 blockers is under analysis. International systematized cross-cutting and comprehensive efforts across the cancer continuum are warranted to inform and shape the areas of research implementation for cancer - aiming to optimize the cure and care for all cancer patients and prevent catastrophic OOP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5003 - Measuring the cancer burden in Europe: the European Cancer Information System (ECIS)
Presenter: Manola Bettio
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
702 - Association between socioeconomic factors and one-month mortality after cancer-directed surgery in solid tumors
Presenter: Zeting Qiu
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion - Public policy - Invited Discussant 1631PD, 1632PD, 1633PD and 1634PD
Presenter: Barbara Melosky
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion - Public policy - Invited Discussant 1638PD, 1639PD and 1640PD
Presenter: Francesco Perrone
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion - Public policy - Invited Discussant 1641PD, 1642PD and 1643PD
Presenter: Jose Martin-Moreno
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion - Public policy - Invited Discussant 1635PD, 1636PD and 1637PD
Presenter: Jose Maria Borras
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Slides