Abstract 4058
Background
For individual treatment planning in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), molecular analyses are increasingly used. As most patients have bone only disease, bone biopsies are often the only source for tumour tissue. However, the success rate of computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsies for molecular analyses in mCRPC patients is only 36.5-44%. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 68Ga-PSMA is a promising tool to increase the success rate of bone biopsies for molecular analyses in mCRPC patients.
Methods
In this multicenter study, the success rate of 68Ga-PSMA guided bone biopsies for molecular diagnostics was retrospectively evaluated in a subset of mCRPC patients who underwent a bone biopsy for whole-genome DNA sequencing within the CPCT-02 study (NCT01855477). To evaluate whether biopsies were obtained from a 68Ga-PSMA positive lesion, rigid body image registration of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and interventional CT was performed. This technique provided volume of interest (VOI) based quantification of 68Ga-PSMA uptake at the exact biopsy site. In addition, the potential impact of molecular analyses on clinical decision making was evaluated.
Results
Sixty-nine 68Ga-PSMA-guided biopsies were eligible for primary analysis. Based on tumor percentage ≥ 30%, 70% of 68Ga-PSMA-guided biopsies was eligible for molecular analyses. At biopsy sites with positive, inconclusive or negative 68Ga-PSMA uptake, tumour percentage was ≥ 30% in 73%, 55% and 36% of the biopsies, respectively (p = 0.0850). At sites of biopsies with a tumour percentage ≥ 30%, standardized uptake value (SUV)max and SUVmean of 68Ga-PSMA were significantly higher (p = 0.0260 and p = 0.0129 respectively), whereas Hounsfield units (HU)mean and HUmax on CT were significantly lower (p = 0.0189 and p = 0.0494 respectively). Molecular analyses identified potentially targetable aberrations including PTEN loss, AR amplifications, and BRCA variants.
Conclusions
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is a useful technique to improve the success rate of CT-guided bone biopsies for molecular analyses in mCRPC patients. Successful bone biopsies for molecular analyses can improve individual treatment planning by detecting targetable mutations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. de Wit: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis. N. Mehra: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi Genzyme; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer. A.A.M. Van der Veldt: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen. M.P. Lolkema: Research grant / Funding (institution): JNJ; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1084 - Dissociated responses in patients with metastatic solid tumors treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Pauline Vaflard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4600 - Patterns and outcomes related to rapid progressive disease in a cohort of advanced solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Presenter: Lucio Ghiglione
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3547 - Real World Outcomes of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) among Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Hospital Settings
Presenter: Saby George
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1124 - Sex-based heterogeneity of efficacy of anticancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Fabio Conforti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4133 - Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
Presenter: Qingyuan Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2548 - Excess weight and efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies in advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Jacobo Rogado
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2228 - Safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor ABBV-181 in lung and head and neck carcinoma
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2333 - Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treatment of advanced solid tumours in octogenarian patients
Presenter: Soraya Mebarki
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4847 - Association of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy with overall survival (OS) in stage IV melanoma treated with targeted therapies
Presenter: Aracelis Torres
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2215 - Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older and younger patients with advanced solid tumours in a real-life setting
Presenter: Pauline Corbaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract