Abstract 719
Background
CT-P6 was approved by both US FDA and European Commission as a biosimilar to reference trastuzumab (RTZ). Here we report updated long term efficacy and safety.
Methods
549 patients with HER2 positive EBC were randomized 1:1 to CT-P6 (n = 271) or RTZ (n = 278) with docetaxel (Cycles 1-4) and 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (Cycles 5-8). After surgery, patients received CT-P6 or RTZ monotherapy to complete a total of 1 year and were followed up to 3 years from enrollment of the last patient. Stratified Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time to event (TTE) analyses.
Results
528 patients (259 in CT-P6 and 269 in RTZ) were followed up. The median duration of follow-up was 39 months. Overall, the rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between CT-P6 and RTZ in both PPS and ITT set. The number of DFS events (42 [16.3%] in CT-P6 and 36 [13.8%] in RTZ) and OS events (18 [6.6%] in CT-P6 and 18 [6.5%] in RTZ) were comparable in ITT set. Median DFS and OS have not been reached due to an insufficient number of events. The mean LVEF was more than 60% in both groups, and no new cases of heart failure were reported during the follow-up period. Table. Summary of Long Term Efficacy EndpointsTable:
190P
PPS | ITT set | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CT-P6 n = 248 | RTZ n = 256 | CT-P6 n = 258 | RTZ n = 261 | |
DFS rate | ||||
1 year (95% CI) | 0.95 (0.91 – 0.97) | 0.96 (0.93 – 0.98) | 0.95 (0.91 – 0.97) | 0.96 (0.93 – 0.98) |
2 years (95% CI) | 0.87 (0.81 – 0.90) | 0.89 (0.85 – 0.92) | 0.87 (0.82 – 0.90) | 0.89 (0.85 – 0.93) |
3 years (95% CI) | 0.82 (0.77 – 0.87) | 0.82 (0.75 – 0.88) | 0.83 (0.77 – 0.87) | 0.83 (0.76 – 0.88) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 1.23 (0.78 – 1.94) | 1.23 (0.78 – 1.93) | ||
p-value | 0.3808 | 0.3807 | ||
CT-P6 n = 248 | RTZ n = 256 | CT-P6 n = 271 | RTZ n = 278 | |
OS rate | ||||
1 year (95% CI) | 1.00 (1.00 – 1.00) | 1.00 (0.97 – 1.00) | 0.99 (0.97 – 1.00) | 0.99 (0.97 – 1.00) |
2 years (95% CI) | 0.98 (0.95 – 0.99) | 0.98 (0.96 – 0.99) | 0.97 (0.93 – 0.98) | 0.98 (0.96 – 0.99) |
3 years (95% CI) | 0.95 (0.91 – 0.97) | 0.94 (0.90 – 0.96) | 0.93 (0.90 – 0.96) | 0.94 (0.90 – 0.96) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 0.87 (0.42 – 1.82) | 1.10 (0.57 – 2.13) | ||
p-value | 0.7181 | 0.7710 |
Conclusions
DFS and OS rates and cardiotoxicity at a median follow-up of 39 months support the similarity of CT-P6 and reference trastuzumab in early-stage breast cancer.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02162667.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Celltrion.
Funding
Celltrion.
Disclosure
J. Stebbing: Officer / Board of Directors, Editer-in-Chief: Oncogene; Advisory / Consultancy: Celltrion; Advisory / Consultancy: Vor Biopharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Benevolent AI; Officer / Board of Directors: BB Biotech Healthcare Trust; Officer / Board of Directors: Xerion Healthcare. Y. Baranau: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novatis. V. Moiseyenko: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca. J. Pikiel: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. A. Eniu: Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): Celltrion; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer. S.J. Lee: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Stock option: Celltrion. M.J. Kim: Full / Part-time employment: Celltrion. S. Kim: Full / Part-time employment: Celltrion. S. Park: Full / Part-time employment: Celltrion. J.H. Bae: Full / Part-time employment: Celltrion. F.J. Esteva: Advisory / Consultancy: Celltrion; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5737 - PAM50 and CGH-array genomic characterization of HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations.
Presenter: Carine Ngo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1096 - OncotypeDX® predictive nomogram for recurrence score output: a machine learning system based on quantitative immunochemistry analysis - ADAPTED01
Presenter: Fabio Marazzi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5426 - Geriatric parameters predict both disease-related and patient-reported outcomes in older patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Willeke van der Plas-Krijgsman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5865 - Patients with a 21-gene assay in South East London differ from the TAILORx trial population
Presenter: Charalampos Gousis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1312 - Predictive tools in adjuvant breast cancer – what is the standard of evidence supporting their utility? A literature review examining validation of Adjuvant!, Cancermath and NHS Predict
Presenter: Alice Loft
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2445 - Oncologic outcome of invasive lobular carcinoma: Is it different from that of invasive ductal carcinoma?
Presenter: Hee Jun Choi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2476 - Pathologic response and survival efficacy in patients with initial nodal involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
Presenter: SERAFIN MORALES Murillo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3761 - Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: prognostic impact on premenopausal Egyptian patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Khaled Abdel Karim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4687 - Predicting the presence of breast cancer using circulating small RNA in the serum
Presenter: Yumiko Koi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5612 - Evaluation of germ line mutational status among women with triple-negative breast cancer in Russia
Presenter: Elena Shagimardanova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract