Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

90P - Where is the balance of benefit? Blue dye anaphylaxis versus sentinel node understaging

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Danayan Luxmanan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103095

Authors

D. Luxmanan1, J. Rushton1, I. Karwasra1, R. Cutress2, M. Zaidi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Southampton General Hospital, Southampton/GB
  • 2 University of Southampton, Southampton/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 90P

Background

Current UK guidelines recommend Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) using dual tracer technique (DTT) with pre-operative Tc-99 radioisotope (identifying ‘hot’ node) and intraoperative Patent Blue V Dye (identifying ‘blue’ node). The reported literature quotes 0.05 to 0.1% anaphylaxis rate to Patent Blue V Dye (PBVD). We anecdotally noted a recent increase in anaphylaxis to PBVD resulting in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and admission to ICU. To assess the balance of risk versus benefit, we reviewed our unit’s SLNB data to (1) identify the proportion of patients experiencing anaphylaxis to PBVD, and (2) to assess the added benefit of PBVD over Tc-99 alone.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted over a 2-year period (2022-2023) including all consecutive patients who underwent SLNB for breast cancer. Patients with incomplete documentation were excluded. Incidence of anaphylaxis proven to PBVD was reviewed. Information on sentinel nodes was categorised as ‘hot only’, ‘hot and blue’ and ‘blue only’ nodes. Macro-positivity for each group was checked to assess localisation technique.

Results

Out of 639 patients who had SLNB, 580 patients with clear documentation were included. Of these, 3 patients (0.52%) suffered severe anaphylaxis to PBVD needing ICU admission. In total, 1013 sentinel nodes (SN) were included in the data analysis; 815 (80.5%) were hot and blue, 155 (15.3%) were hot only and 43 (4.2%) were blue only. Therefore, SN identification rate with Tc-99 was 95.8% and PBVD was 84.7% Macrometastases were present in 75 nodes, of which 58 (77.3%) were both hot and blue, 15 (20.0%) were hot only and 2 (2.7%) were blue only, with a total of 73 (97.3%) malignant hot nodes and 60 (80.0%) malignant blue nodes. The two ‘blue only’ nodes were from separate patients and in one of them, the ‘blue only’ node was the singular positive sentinel node.

Conclusions

In this series, the rate of anaphylaxis from blue dye (3/580) was comparable to the contribution of blue dye alone to SLNB staging (2/580). Larger data is needed to evaluate this with greater confidence. The results will however be helpful for surgical planning and informed decision making.

Drs. Luxmanan and James Rushton have equally contributed to the study.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.