Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

285P - Survivorship care plans and recurrence detection in breast cancer patients

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Lorenzo Belluzzi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-12. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103324

Authors

L. Belluzzi1, S. Natalizio1, B. Medici1, R. Cuoghi Costantini1, F. Canino1, M. Barbolini2, A. Molinaro1, L. Moscetti1, F. Piacentini2, M. Dominici2, C. Omarini2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena/IT
  • 2 Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41125 - Modena/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 285P

Background

Care for people diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) does not end when active treatment has finished, but continues to detect early recurrences and manage side effects. No randomized data exist to support any individual follow-up (FU) protocol. We retrospectively review the Modena Cancer Center survivorship program and its correlation to survival outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective review of all BC FU visits performed between 2016 and 2023 was done. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to correlate disease characteristics, type of recurrence and mode of relapse with overall survival (OS), estimated by log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves. All analyses were performed using R version 4.3.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2023).

Results

From June 2016 to June 2023, 20.650 FU visits were done, detecting 256 relapses (1, 2%): 173 distant relapses (67.6%) and 83 loco-regional ones (32.4%). As expected, patients relapsed during the FU period have worse OS compared with those relapsed at the end of the FU program (mOS: 5.6 years vs 8.9 years, respectively; p = 0.001). In particular, tumor markers and/or imaging tests (except for annual mammography), performed routinely, did not improve OS in BC patients (p 0.446 and p 0.792, respectively). Even the frequency of in-person visits (4 vs 6 months) did not improve OS, independently of BC subtypes and clinical stage at diagnosis (p 0.219). Overall, relapse detection due to clinical signs/symptoms, PS ECOG 1-3 and metastatic visceral sites were negative independent prognosticators for survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

BC FU visits rarely detected recurrence. An intensive survivorship care plan with tumor markers and/or routine imaging tests did not improve OS. Considering the progressive increasing of BC survivors, the survivorship care program should be redefined. Due to the retrospective and mono-institutional nature of this study, data from prospective clinical trials are needed.

Legal entity responsible for the study

C. Omarini.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.