Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

73P - Real-world analysis of the use of the 21-gene assay in prognostically intermediate luminal breast cancer (BC): Experience from a French multicenter cohort

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Caroline Charles

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-34. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103010

Authors

B. Cutuli1, N. Joyon2, L. De Poncheville3, M. Lacroix-Triki2, S. Delaloge4, J.T.L. Ribeiro Mourato4, C. Bousrih4, A.A. Viansone4, C. Charles5

Author affiliations

  • 1 ICC Institut du Cancer Courlancy REIMS, Reims/FR
  • 2 Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif/FR
  • 3 Breast Institute of Charente Maritime, Clinique de l’Atlantique, Puilboreau/FR
  • 4 Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Cedex/FR
  • 5 CHU de Montpellier - Hopital Gui de Chauliac, Biarritz/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 73P

Background

Real-world data on indications of Oncotype DX® testing (RS) and its impact on adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (CET) use in early-stage BC pN0/1 patient (pt) subpopulations and across multiple French centers are limited.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive retrospective observational study of BC characteristics, management practices, and therapeutic decision impact of RS results.

Results

952 pts underwent RS testing, including 420 across 2 private clinics (Apr 2014 – Dec 2023), and 505 at Gustave Roussy Institute (Nov 2020 – Dec 2023). Pt characteristics were consistent across private/public centers and were as follows: ≤50y 32.2 %, 51–70y 60.1 %, >70y, 7.7 %; 64.1 % postmenopausal, 35.1 % premenopausal; male 0.8% (n=8). Pathological tumor size, pT1a-b 7.9 %, pT1c 56.2 %, pT2 33.4 %, pT3–4 1.4 %, ypT1c–2, 1.1%; tumor grade 1 13.0 %/ 2 66.6 %/ 3 20.5 %; invasive ductal carcinoma 75.8 %, invasive lobular carcinoma 13.7 %; Ki67 >20%, 49.0 %; pN0 62.7 %, pN1mi 11.4 %, pN1 25.9 %. Retrospective analysis showed that primary reason for testing was for discordant/intermediate histoprognostic factors (73.2 %). Other reasons were the need to confirm endocrine therapy only or CET indication (9.7 %/15.2 %, respectively). Mean test turnaround time was 6.5±2.5 days and was stable over time. As compared to pre-test decisions, RS results led to a 67.6 % reduction in CET use (Table). In pN0 and pN1mi/N1 pts, this reduction was 60.9 % and 78.3 %, respectively. Higher de-escalation rates were observed in pN1mi/N1 pts in most subgroups. Table: 73P

Indications of chemoendocrine therapy before/after RS testing

CET indication All pts ≤50y 51-70y >70y Pre-menopausal Post-menopausal Male
All pN, n 941 304 564 73 331 602 8
Pre-test (%) 89.1 % 84.9 % 90.8 % 93.2 % 85.8 % 90.7 % 100.0 %
Post-test (%) 28.8 % 38.6 % 22.5 % 37.0 % 38.2 % 23.9 % 12.5 %
% decrease -67.6 % -54.5 % -75.2 % -60.3 % -55.5 % -73.6 % -87.5 %
pN0, n 587 230 321 36 248 334 5
Pre-test (%) 87.1 % 83.9 % 88.8 % 91.7 % 85.1 % 88.3 % 100.0 %
Post-test (%) 34.0 % 42.2 % 27.6 % 38.9 % 41.1 % 29.2 % 0.0 %
% decrease -60.9 % -49.7 % -68.9 % -57.6 % -51.7 % -66.9 % -100.0 %
pN1mi/N1, n 349 73 239 37 82 264 3
Pre-test (%) 92.6 % 87.7 % 93.7 % 94.6 % 87.8 % 93.9 % 100.0 %
Post-test (%) 20.1 % 27.4 % 15.5 % 35.1 % 29.3 % 17.1 % 33.3 %
% decrease -78.3 % -68.8 % -83.4 % -62.9 % -66.7 % -81.8 % -66.7 %

Conclusions

RS testing allowed for considerable therapy de-escalation in our cohort, including in specific subpopulations. Our results confirm the test’s utility to refine management strategies and avoid overtreatment in daily clinical practice. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed in a pharmacoeconomic substudy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

N. Joyon: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Exact Sciences. M. Lacroix-Triki: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Exact Sciences, Myriad Genetics. S. Delaloge: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis, Sanofi, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche Genentech, BMS, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, ad board: Besins Healthcare; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, ESMO symposium: Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, scientific board: Elsan; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors, Société Française de Sénologie et Pathologie Mammaire: SFSPM; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, H2020 funding: European Commission. J.T.L. Ribeiro Mourato: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Exact Sciences. A.A. Viansone: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Speakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Eisai Europe. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.