Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

106P - Incorporating religious and cultural background: Patient informed consent in the era of acellular dermal matrix breast reconstruction

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Kassandra Beltran

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103095

Authors

J.A. Foppiani1, E. Kim2, K. Beltran3, A. Hernandez Alvarez2, I. Taritsa2, M.J. Escobar-Domingo2, D. Lee2, K.A. Schuster2, S. Terkonda4, S. J. Lin2, O. Ho4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, Boston/US
  • 2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, Boston/US
  • 3 Charles University in Prague, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague/CZ
  • 4 Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA, Jacksonville, Florida, USA/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 106P

Background

Acellular Dermal Matrices (ADMs) have become an integral part of breast reconstruction. An additional level of informed consent may hinge on personal and cultural beliefs, especially concerning the source matrix. This study seeks to evaluate socio-cultural factors influencing patient decisions on ADM use, with the end goal of enhancing practice through better-informed consent and comprehension of patient values.

Methods

A survey of adult women in the U.S. and India was conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Chi-squared tests were used to compare preferences across dietary and religious groups.

Results

645 complete responses were analyzed, with 12.2% from India and 87.8% from the USA. Predominantly, respondents were White (68.2%) or Asian (26.2%), with major religious affiliations being Christianity (68.4%) and Hinduism (23.7%). The most common dietary preferences were Vegetarian (36.2%), Omnivorous (27.9%), and Vegan (21.3%). Upon disclosing the composition of ADMs, 49 (6.5%) individuals changed their answers and opted against Human Cadaveric ADM; 82 (10.8%) against Bovine-derived ADM; 101 (13.3%) against Porcine-derived ADM; and 73 (9.6%) against Ovine-derived ADM. Both religion and diet type significantly impacted individuals' decisions to forgo ADM usage upon understanding its composition (P <0.001), and also notably influenced their choices of ADM types (P = 0.024).

Conclusions

Disclosing ADM’s origin significantly impacted patient choices, and in some cases, shifted the patient’s opinion of potential choice. Thorough counseling of surgical preferences is a crucial component of patient care. The findings advocate for the importance of culturally sensitive discussions in improving healthcare equity in our diverse society.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.