Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

249P - Efficacy and tolerability of low dose metronomic chemotherapy using capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Karolina Larsson

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-47. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103200

Authors

K. Larsson1, B.K. Linderholm2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Sahlgrenska University Hospital - Jubileumskliniken, Göteborg/SE
  • 2 The Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 249P

Background

Patients with MBC prefer convenient treatments with low toxicity but without compromised efficacy. Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT), which involves oral low dose continuous administration, is used in selected cases. However, evidence of efficacy with different chemotherapies used in MCT is limited. Here we provide evidence specifically on MCT-CX (Capecitabine 500 mg x 3 and Cyclophosphamide 50 mg x 1).

Methods

This is an open single-armed prospective phase II trial at one site in Sweden. A Fleming two stage design with first analysis after 20 evaluable cases was applied. If ≤8 responders (ineffective) or ≥13 responses (effective) the study would be terminated. Otherwise, treatment was considered effective if in total ≥18 (45 %) responded. Primary endpoint was Clinical benefit rate (CBR); proportion of cases with Complete response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included Over all response rate (ORR; CR or PR), Progression free survival (PFS), Overall survival (OS), safety and Quality of Life.

Results

In total, 40 patients were included between 2019-2023. Ages ranged between 49-86 years. 82% had endocrine resistant Luminal MBC. Seven patients presented with bone-only disease, and 50% had liver metastasis. In 58% treatment was given beyond second-line. First analysis after 20 evaluable cases showed eleven responders which warranted further investigation. Final analysis showed an CBR of 45%; 8 PR, 10 SD ≥ 24 weeks. ORR was 20%, however 15 participants had non-measurable disease and could reach SD as best outcome. Median PFS was 17 months and median OS 20 months. Low grade hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea were the most reported toxicities.

Conclusions

Almost half of participants with far advanced MBC responded to treatment with MCT-CX and presented with mild toxicities. This provides a feasible treatment option applicable to patients commonly seen by oncologists in daily practice. Randomized trials comparing MCT not only to standard dosing chemotherapy but also to best supportive care are needed.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04350021.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Västra Götalands Regionen.

Funding

Bröstcancerförbundet, Anna-Lisa och Bror Björnssons stiftelse, SU-fonden Sahlgrenska University hospital, ALF Västra Götalands Regionen.

Disclosure

K. Larsson: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Second opinions: Canser. B.K. Linderholm: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Novartis.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.