Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

22P - PD-L1 testing in mTNBC: Interplatform and interobserver reproducibility of CE-IVD assays for CPS and IC scores

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Nicola Fusco

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101218-101218. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101218

Authors

N. Fusco1, M. Ivanova1, C. Frascarelli2, B. Cerbelli3, G. Pignataro3, C. Criscitiello4, K. Venetis5, E. Sajjadi6, E. Guerini-Rocco1, P. Graziano7, M. Martini8, G. D'Amati3

Author affiliations

  • 1 IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan/IT
  • 2 UNIMI - Università degli Studi di Milano Statale, Milan/IT
  • 3 Sapienza - Università di Roma, Rome/IT
  • 4 Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan/IT
  • 5 IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, 20141 - Milan/IT
  • 6 University of Milan, 20121 - Milan/IT
  • 7 Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo/IT
  • 8 University of Messina, Messina/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 22P

Background

PD-L1 test is recommended to select mTNBC patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Several factors may challenge this test, including: 1) different assays and platforms available, 2) different scoring systems (CPS and IC), 3) different cut-off values (CPS≥10 and IC≥1%), and 4) different indications (CPS→pembrolizumab and IC→atezolizumab). We aimed to characterize the interobserver and interassay reproducibility of PD-L1 testing in mTNBC using the currently validated CE-IVD assays for CPS and IC.

Methods

60 mTNBC samples were subjected to PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 22C3 pharmDx on a Dako Autostainer Link 48, and both SP263 and SP142 on a Ventana BenchMark Ultra. CPS was evaluated with both 22C3 and SP263 by 5 pathologists (certified PD-L1 trainers). In addition, IC with SP142 was assessed by 3 of the 5 pathologists, with specific expertise in breast pathology. After intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) calculation for each assay and corresponding cut-offs (CPS≥10 and IC≥1%), the inter-rater and inter-platform agreements were measured by Fleiss’s κ (95% confidence interval, CI). Statistical analyses were performed with R (v 4.2.2) and irr (interrater reliability) package (CRAN).

Results

Significant (p<0.001) ICC was observed with both CPS assays (22C3=0.939 (CI:0.913-0.96); SP263=0.972 (CI:0.96-0.982); combined=0.909 (CI:0.874-0.938)). Fleiss’s κ confirmed an almost perfect agreement both among pathologists and assays (22C3=0.938 (CI:0.857-1.018); κ=0.972 (CI:0.890-1.052); combined=0.907 (CI:0.869-0.945)). Perfect inter-rater agreement was reached for IC (100%). The correlation between CPS and IC scores, albeit significant, was lower (ICC=0.634 (CI:0.455-0.816); κ=0.619 (CI:0.537-0.700)).

Conclusions

In mTNBC, CPS can be reliably performed either by 22C3 on a Dako platform (as in the KEYNOTE studies) or SP263 on a Ventana platform. CPS and IC are not interchangeable tests in mTNBC but each test is accurate when assessed by trained pathologists using CE-IVD assays, precisely 22C3 and SP263 for CPS and SP142 for IC score.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding

Disclosure

N. Fusco: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis. C. Criscitiello: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo. E. Guerini-Rocco: Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: Thermo Fisher, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Biocartis, Exact Science, GSK, Illumina. P. Graziano, M. Martini: Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: MSD. G. D'Amati: Financial Interests, Invited Speaker: MSD, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.