Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

262P - Breast cancer survivors and healthy women: could gut microbiota make a difference? - “BiotaCancerSurvivors”: a case-control study

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Telma Caleça

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101224-101224. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101224

Authors

T.M. Caleça1, P. Casal Ribeiro2, M.M. Vitorino1, M.B. Menezes3, M. Sampaio Alves4, A. Duarte Mendes1, R.S. Vicente5, I. Negreiros6, A. Faria7, D. Alpuim Costa6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hospital Prof. Dr Fernando Fonseca EPE (Hospital Amadora/Sintra), Amadora/PT
  • 2 Laboratory Medicine Centre Germano de Sousa, Lisbon/PT
  • 3 Hospital Espírito Santo de Évora, Évora/PT
  • 4 FMUP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto/PT
  • 5 Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora/PT
  • 6 Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon/PT
  • 7 NOVA Medical School - Faculdade de Ciencias Medicas, Lisbon/PT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 262P

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second cause of cancer-specific death in women worldwide. Increasing evidence suggests that gut microbial dysbiosis may have a role to play in the pathogenesis, treatment and prognosis of BC.

Methods

The “BiotaCancerSurvivors” was a prospective, longitudinal, observational, unicentric and case-control study that aimed to analyse whether the gut microbiota differs between cancer survivors and a database of healthy controls. In this first analysis, samples from 23 BC survivors (group 1) and 291 healthy female controls (group 2) were characterised through the V3 and V4 regions that encode the “16S rRNA” gene of each bacteria. The samples were sequenced by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), and the taxonomy was identified by resorting to Kraken2 and improved with Bracken, using a curated database called 'GutHealth_DB'. The α and β-diversity analyses were used to determine the gut microbiota's richness and evenness. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess differential abundance between both groups. Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared test.

Results

The α-diversity was significantly higher in group 1 (p=.28e-12 for the Chao index and p= 1.64e-12 for the ACE index). Shannon index wasn't statistically different between the two groups (p=.72). The microbiota composition was different between both groups: a null hypothesis was rejected for PERMANOVA (p=9.99e-05) and Anosim (p=.04) and was not rejected for β-dispersion (p=.158), using Unifrac weighted distance. Relative abundance of 14 phyla, 29 classes, 25 orders, 64 families, 116 genera and 74 species differed significantly between both groups. F/B ratio was signicantly lower in group 1 than in group 2, p<0.001.

Conclusions

We observed significant taxonomic disparities between BC survivors and healthy controls. Additional studies are needed to clarify the involved mechanisms and explore the relationship between microbiota and BC survivorship. Still, the data we possess so far, instills a need for further exploration of this field, given the potential microbiota role as a prognostic biomarker for BC survivorship.

Editorial acknowledgement

We want to thank CUF Oncologia and to all voluntary women enrolled in the BiotaCancerSurvivors study.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D. Alpuim Costa: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Portuguese Navy; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Cuf Oncology, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: NTT DATA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nanobiotix; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Merck KGaA, Nestlé, Pfizer, Uriage, Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.