Abstract 354P
Background
In Malaysia, up to 68% of cancer patients uses CAM, with CAM disclosure at only 7.6%. Perception of doctors’ poor knowledge on CAM, and non-belief in its practice are some reasons cited for non-disclosure. This may lead to various complications.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was carried out in 2 university hospitals in Malaysia from 1st July to 23rd December 2016. All doctors and nurses of Oncology Departments were included. Subjects were briefed on the study before questionnaires were distributed and returned anonymously once completed. The questionnaire was adopted with local adaptations, from a study done in Japan on perceptions and attitudes on CAM. A pilot study was done and the final validated version consists of 2 sections. Section A consists of questions on socio-demographic characteristics of respondent. Section B consisted of questions to assess the respondent’s knowledge, perception and attitude on CAM. Each question was given a point scale. Based on total points obtained, respondents were classified into good or poor knowledge, positive or negative perception and attitude towards CAM.
Results
Total of 60 nurses and 26 doctors responded, with 16 male and 70 female. Generally, all respondents have poor knowledge on CAM. Two thirds (67.4%) were not aware of the existence of the National Policy on CAM in Malaysia. Most have very little or no knowledge on the CAM modalities listed. The respondents have negative perception on CAM, with 83.7% feel the lack of evidence in its effectiveness. Most (72%) think that there is a definite or possible interaction between CAM products and anticancer drugs. All have negative attitude on CAM except 8.1% of respondents encouraging the use of CAM. Majority do not encourage the use of CAM products in both early (79.1%) and advanced (64%) stage.
Conclusions
Oncology-related healthcare providers have poor knowledge, with negative perception and attitude towards CAM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
144P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
145P - A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
Presenter: Qing-Zhu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
146P - Red cell distribution width and mean corpuscular volume ratio as a promising new marker for chemotherapy effects in remnant gastric cancer: An analysis of a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai-Xiang Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
147P - Can the clinical stage of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification stratify prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III cancer?
Presenter: Hayato Watanabe
Session: e-Poster Display Session
148P - MCV-the ideal answer to predict the prognosis of remnant gastric cancer: An analysis from a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai Weng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
149P - Molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with resectable gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
150P - Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns associated with unresectable advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in China
Presenter: Xiao Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
151P - Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, economic and survival outcomes associated with unresectable advanced metastatic gastric cancers in Taiwan
Presenter: Chee Jen Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
152P - ARID1A deficiency in EBV-positive gastric cancer is partially regulated by EBV-encoded miRNAs, but not by DNA promotor hypermethylation
Presenter: Koji Kase
Session: e-Poster Display Session