Abstract 250P
Background
Treatment for cervical cancer can significantly affect a patient’s quality of life. The purpose of this research: to study the quality of life in patients with cervical cancer and to analyze the dependence of the quality of life indicators on radiation doses obtained when living in areas adjacent to the Semipalatinsk test site.
Methods
In this study, a survey was conducted of 20 patients (women aged 27 to 70 years, average age 52 years) who received chemoradiation therapy. The questionnaire to assess the quality of life, carried out after treatment, using the official versions of questionnaires EORTC QLQ-CX24. The QLQ-CX24 module includes functional and symptomatic scales. The assessment of individual radiation doses received while living in areas exposed to radioactive exposure was carried out in accordance with official guidelines.
Results
The results obtained for functional scales: overall quality of life 78.4 ± 15.2, body image 80.2 ± 15.3, sexual activity 20.4 ± 19.5, sexual satisfaction 52.4 ± 18.3, sexual/vaginal functioning 42.6 ± 19.8 points. For symptomatic scales: symptoms 15.6 ± 12.8, lymphadenoma 12.9 ± 15.4, peripheral neuropathy 23.9 ± 14.7, menopausal symptoms 33.3 ± 28.4, sexual anxiety 32.4 ± 22.5 points.
Individual radiation doses received by patients while living in radioactively contaminated territories range from 1.06 to 36.11 cSv. For the study group, the relationship between indicators of quality of life and individual radiation doses have not been established. It is impossible to unequivocally affirm the absence of this dependence due to the insufficient number and heterogeneity of the studied group in a number of parameters.
Conclusions
A sufficiently high scale value indicates the overall quality of life reflects a good level of functioning. The rather low levels of the scales of symptoms, lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy indicate the severity of this symptomatology during preventive exposure to PALS. For the study group, the relationship between indicators of quality of life and individual radiation doses have not been established.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Resources from the same session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
144P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
145P - A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
Presenter: Qing-Zhu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
146P - Red cell distribution width and mean corpuscular volume ratio as a promising new marker for chemotherapy effects in remnant gastric cancer: An analysis of a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai-Xiang Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
147P - Can the clinical stage of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification stratify prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III cancer?
Presenter: Hayato Watanabe
Session: e-Poster Display Session
148P - MCV-the ideal answer to predict the prognosis of remnant gastric cancer: An analysis from a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai Weng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
149P - Molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with resectable gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
150P - Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns associated with unresectable advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in China
Presenter: Xiao Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
151P - Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, economic and survival outcomes associated with unresectable advanced metastatic gastric cancers in Taiwan
Presenter: Chee Jen Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
152P - ARID1A deficiency in EBV-positive gastric cancer is partially regulated by EBV-encoded miRNAs, but not by DNA promotor hypermethylation
Presenter: Koji Kase
Session: e-Poster Display Session