Abstract 55P
Background
Treatment of heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involves several lines of chemotherapy however, favourable side effect profile and a convenient mode of administration are important. Eribulin, is with proven activity in aggressive MBC however, there is paucity of real-world data from India and merits exploration.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed, previously treated MBC patients who had at least 2 lines of prior therapy and received intravenous Eribulin at the dose of 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 in 3 weekly cycles, between 2013 and 2019. To describe the clinical performance of eribulin we adopted the approach suggested by Dzimitrowicz and colleagues (J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:3511e17); Tumour Response (TR) was defined as the proportion of physician-reported clinical or imaging (RECIST) response. Furthermore, we evaluated median Progression Free (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) by the Kaplan Meier method. The patients were monitored for toxicity by CTCAE 4.3 criteria.
Results
There were 78 patients with the median age of 53 (32-75) years, 2 (2.6%) had male breast cancer. The median number of previous chemotherapy lines was 5(2-7); visceral involvement was present in 76 (97.4%) patients with median of 3 organs (range 0-6) involvement and bones (61.5%) being most common site followed by lung (52.5%). A median of 3.5 (1-11) cycles of eribulin was administered. TR seen as partial responses in 35 (44.9%), stable disease in 9 (11.5%), and progressive disease in 34 (43.6%) patients. The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.2-3.8), and median OS was 7 (95% CI: 5.1-8.9) months. Interestingly, eribulin activity was unrelated to the number of previous lines and type of metastatic involvement. Eribulin was well tolerated with only 2 (2.5%) patients discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. Significant grade 3/4 toxicities seen included peripheral neuropathy in 10 (12.8%) which peaked after 6 cycles and neutropenia in 17 (21.8%) of patients while dose reductions were required in 6 (7.7%) of patients.
Conclusions
In this relatively large, single Institution, real practice analysis eribulin is an efficacious, safe and easy to administer option for pre-treated MBC and merits consideration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
95P - Prognosis of Japanese patients with detailed RAS/BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
Presenter: Tatsuki Ikoma
Session: e-Poster Display Session
96P - Early-onset colorectal cancer prognosis, conflict resolution, review of literature and meta-analysis
Presenter: Ereny Poles
Session: e-Poster Display Session
97P - A population-based study to assess the associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status (SES) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
98P - Operational challenges of an Asian Pacific (APAC) academic oncology clinical trial
Presenter: Daphne Day
Session: e-Poster Display Session
99P - Development of a qRT-PCR-based diagnostic test to identify colorectal cancer patients with recurrent R-Spondin gene fusions
Presenter: Veronica Diermayr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
100P - Individualized treatment of advanced digestive system tumour guided by PDTX mouse model: A multicenter trial
Presenter: yuan cheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
101P - HIF1-α depletion overcomes resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer via ERK signalling pathway
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
102P - Colorectal cancer organoids culture exploits new neoadjuvant therapy resistance mechanisms and therapeutic targets
Presenter: Yun Deng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
103P - Comprehensive genomic landscape in younger and older Chinese patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Huina Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session