Abstract 274P
Background
Treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) is associated with significant acute toxicity, and accurately identifying patients who will not tolerate aggressive treatment remains a challenge. Comorbidity indices are known prognostic factors for HNC survival outcomes. However, no index has been found to be superior, and their performance in predicting early outcomes in HNC patients is not known. This retrospective analysis aims to determine the role of comorbidity indices in predicting 90-day mortality after radical radiotherapy.
Methods
Study population included all non-thyroid, non-metastatic HNC patients who received curative intent radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, from 2016-2019 in a single tertiary oncology centre. 260 patients were randomly selected for model building and comparison. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyse the performance of six comorbidity scores – the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), age-adjusted CCI (ACCI), head and neck CCI (HNCCI), Simplified Comorbidity Score (SCS), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) and the Washington University Head and Neck Comorbidity Index (WUNHCI)– in predicting risk of 90-day mortality after radical treatment. ROC analysis was done to identify the best performing index, on which further analysis was carried out to determine the best cut-off.
Results
46 out of a total of 958 eligible patients (4.8%) died within 90 days after radical treatment in our cohort. Four of the six comorbidity scores were independent predictors of early mortality [CCI: odds ratio (OR) 1.298, p=0.004; ACE-27: OR 2.577, p<0.001; ACCI: OR 1.324, p<0.001; HNCCI: OR 2.056, p=0.001]. From ROC analysis of the remaining four comorbidity indices, ACCI was the best performing model (AUC 0.728). Calculation of the Youden Index yielded a threshold of ACCI score > 3 as the most discriminatory cut-off in predicting 90-day mortality. ACCI >3 was associated with more than 20% mortality in our cohort.
Conclusions
Age-adjusted CCI > 3 is associated with a higher risk of early mortality in HNC patients after radical radiotherapy. This may be taken as an easily accessible reference for discussion in the clinical setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session