Abstract 493P
Background
Mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) is a crucial procedure during non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection, but the prognostic value of 4L lymph node dissection ( 4L-LND) continues to be controversial. Here, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the associations of 4L-LND with short- and long- term survival outcomes in surgically treated NSCLC patients.
Methods
We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Corchrane Library up to May 1, 2023. Studies investigating the prognostic value of 4L-LND and non-4L-LND on NSCLC survival were included. Data for analysis mainly included postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The Q-test and I2-test were used to assess heterogeneity. The stability of pooled HRs was examined by sensitivity analysis.
Results
ix retrospective studies with a total of 4565 NSCLC patients who received 4L-LND or did not receive 4L-LND were included. The 4L-LND group had a significantly better OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.91, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.88, P = 0.0002) than the non-4L-LND group, especially in the subgroup analysis of PSM studies. Although no significant difference in chest tube drainage for more than 7 days rate (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.31–3.08, P = 0.97), hoarseness rate (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.53–4.87, P = 0.51), and chylothorax rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.58–2.84, P = 0.54) was observed, however, those who received 4L-LND had a higher total postoperative complication rate than those who did not (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). There was no significant heterogeneity during our analysis, and no potential publication bias was observed among these studies.
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis showed that the 4L-LND group was significantly associated with both survival outcomes and postoperative complications compared to the non-4L-LND group in treating NSCLC patients. However, more prospective clinical trials should be well-designed to evaluate our conclusion due to the lack of guideline surpport.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
W. Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
414P - Landscape of ERBB2 mutations in advanced cancers (AC) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) in Asia and Middle East (AME)
Presenter: Byoung Chul Cho
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
415P - Initial experience in a real-world Asian cohort with a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) assay
Presenter: Steven Tucker
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Three-dimensional bioprinting model of ovarian cancer for identification of patient-specific therapy response
Presenter: Jiangang Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
417P - Early experience in using plasma-only multi-omic minimal residual disease testing in early-stage colorectal cancer patients from Asia and the Middle East
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
418P - Decoding the intricate cellular makeup of immune-related adverse events using single-cell and spatial analysis
Presenter: Dmitrii Shek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
420P - Combinatory genomic and transcriptomic sequencing of Chinese KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer revealed molecular and inflammatory heterogeneity in tumor microenvironment
Presenter: Xuchao Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
421P - Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) unravels somatic BRCA (sBRCA) and homologous recombinant repair (HRR) gene alterations across multi-cancer spectrum
Presenter: Ramya Kodandapani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
422P - CD8Teff distinguished tumor immunotyping heterogeneity and enables precision immunotherapy
Presenter: luhui Mao
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
423P - Insights into clinically actionable biomarkers in an Indian cancer cohort of 1000 patients using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)
Presenter: Mithua Ghosh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
424P - MD Anderson Cancer Center global precision oncology decision support (Glo-PODS) clinical trial genomic support: Pilot program at the Prince of Wales Hospital (Chinese University of Hong Kong - CUHK)
Presenter: Brigette Ma
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract