Abstract 156P
Background
Atezo-Bev is the standard first-line therapy against uHCC. However, there is no globally established subsequent treatment after failure on first-line Atezo-Bev. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line regorafenib in uHCC pts who progressed on first-line Atezo-Bev.
Methods
This is a phase II investigator-initiated trial involving 2 academic centers in Korea. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of HCC; prior treatment with Atezo-Bev at least ≥ 2 cycles; Child-Pugh A; ECOG performance status 0-1. Eligible patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily 3 weeks on/1 week off until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) according to the RECIST v1.1, overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE).
Results
Total 40 pts were recruited from Dec 2021 to May 2023. Pts characteristics were as follows: median age of 56 years (range, 36-81); hepatitis B (77.5%), hepatitis C (10.0%), non-viral (12.5%); BCLC C stage (97.5%); and AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml (40.0%). As of the date of data cut-off (15 Aug 2023), the median follow-up duration was 6.6 mo (95% CI, 5.0-8.2). The median PFS was 3.5 mo (95% CI, 3.0-4.0). ORR and DCR were 10.0% and 82.5%. The median OS was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 8.3-11.1) and 6-month OS rate was 55.0%. The median OS since the start of prior Atezo-Bev was 16.6 mo (95% CI, 11.9-21.3). When stratified according to the duration of prior Atezo-Bev (<4 cycles [n=10] vs. ≥4 cycles [n=30]), pts with ≥4 cycles of prior Atezo-Bev showed better median OS (not reached vs 3.6 mo; p=0.001) and ORR (13.3% vs 0%; p=0.009), while there was a trend for better median PFS (3.8 mo vs 2.5 mo; p=0.107). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were thrombocytopenia (5.0%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2.5%), and fatigue (2.5%).
Conclusions
Regorafenib was effective as second-line therapy in uHCC pts who progressed on first-line Atezo-Bev. Efficacy and safety outcomes from our study were consistent with those observed in the pivotal phase 3 RESORCE trial which required sorafenib-tolerated/progressed pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05134532.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Bayr.
Disclosure
J. Cheon: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Eisai. H. Kim: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myeres Squibbb, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Boryung Pharmaceuticals, Boostimmune. M.H. Ryu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: DAEWHA Pharmaceutical, BMS, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: DAEWHA Pharmaceutical, BMS, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical. H.J. Chon: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai, Roche, Bayer, Ono, MSD, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, Servier, AstraZeneca, SillaJen, Menarini, GreenCross Cell; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Roche, Dong-A ST, Boryung Pharmaceuticals. R.S. Finn: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CSTONE, Eisai, Exelixis, Eli LIlly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech, Hengrui; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bayer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Pfizer, Merck. C. Yoo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Servier, Roche, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
228P - Real-world data on dose adjustment of cabozantinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Hemavathi Baskarane
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
229P - The application of diffusion kurtosis imaging in predicting muscle invasion of bladder cancer: A comparison with conventional DWI
Presenter: Shuai Jiang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Oncological outcomes between partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in solitary muscle invasive bladder cancer with downgraded T stage
Presenter: Ming Wei Hsu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
231P - BMI-predicted progression-free survival after pembrolizumab therapy for urothelial cancer: Asian version of BMI classification is suitable for Asian patients
Presenter: mirii harada
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
232P - The immunosuppressive features of the 20S Proteasome β-subunit gene family in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)-mutated clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A TCGA-based bioinformatics study
Presenter: Saja Alzghoul
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
233P - The crosstalk between PBRM1 loss and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A possible interconnection to immunotherapy response
Presenter: Ahmed Al Sharie
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
235P - Do FGFR2 and 3 proteins have a role in the prognosis of urothelial bladder carcinoma?
Presenter: Alshimaa Al Hanafy
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
236P - The effects of chemotherapy on body composition in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: KOSUKE KITAMURA
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
237P - Real-world analysis of adjuvant nivolumab in resected urothelial cancer: A single institute study in Taiwanese patients
Presenter: Mu-Hsin Chang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
238P - Enfortumab-vedotin for metastatic urothelial carcinoma refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single institution experience
Presenter: Yuki Endo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract