Abstract 230P
Background
As far as we know, we have yet to establish the long-term cancer outcomes of partial cystectomy (PC) for urothelial carcinoma. Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex and risky procedure for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In some cases, PC with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection can be an option in selected patients but may compromise oncologic success. We compared the recurrence patterns and survival rates of patients who had either partial or radical cystectomy for MIBC patients with solitary tumor.
Methods
We identified 30 solitary MIBC patients with downgraded staging below cT2 after TURBT or neoadjuvant systemic therapy at our hospital from 2014 to 2021. They had either partial cystectomy or radical cystectomy and all of them had pathological T staging below pT2. We compare the overall survival, cancer specific survival and recurrence pattern including local recurrence and metastasis.
Results
The median postoperative follow-up period was 5 years, with a range of 1 to 8.5 years. When comparing patients who underwent partial cystectomy to those who underwent radical cystectomy, no significant differences were observed in the 5-year distant recurrence-free survival rates (100% vs 94.5%, p = 0.23) or cancer-specific survival rates (91.7% vs 100%, p = 0.43). Furthermore, there were no instances of extravesical pelvic tumor recurrence in either the partial or radical cystectomy groups postoperatively. Among the patients who underwent partial cystectomy, 6 out of 12 (50%) experienced intravesical recurrence of the tumor, and only 1 out of 12 (5.5%) ultimately required conversion to radical cystectomy.
Conclusions
For patients with solitary muscle-invasive bladder cancer that has been downgraded to a stage below cT2, partial cystectomy is a feasible option as it offers a similar metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival rate when compared to radical cystectomy. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that patients who received partial cystectomy remain at risk of experiencing recurrence within the bladder. Therefore, it is imperative to provide these patients with appropriate counseling and ongoing monitoring to address this potential risk.
Clinical trial identification
Not applicable
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87TiP - Phase I expansion study of the tissue factor (TF)–targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) XB002 as a single-agent and combination therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors (JEWEL-101)
Presenter: Mustafa Syed
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
88TiP - A phase Ib study of HMBD-001, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER3, with or without chemotherapy in patients with genetic aberrations in HER3 signaling
Presenter: Nick Pavlakis
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (F) + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (P) + BSC in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Asian vs non-Asian outcomes in FRESCO-2
Presenter: Daisuke Kotani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Sidedness-dependent prognostic impact of gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the nationwide cancer genome screening project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN)
Presenter: Takeshi Kajiwara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Interim results of a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy vs long course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma rectum
Presenter: Sandip Barik
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus PD-1 blockade in TKI-responsive MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC): Updated results of TRAP study
Presenter: Jingdong Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Asian subgroup analysis of the phase III LEAP-017 trial of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs standard-of-care in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Real clinical impact of postoperative surgical complications after colon cancer surgery
Presenter: Toru Aoyama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Extended lymphadenectomy may not be necessary for MSI-H colon cancer patients after immunotherapy
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Identification of phenomic data in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: A UK biobank data analysis
Presenter: Shirin Hui Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract